From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvVJL-0001Vx-Ej for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 14:35:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvVJI-00077q-5k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 14:35:15 -0400 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:35269 helo=cvs.linux-mips.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvVJH-0006yL-Tm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2015 14:35:12 -0400 Received: (from localhost user: 'macro', uid#1010) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27006567AbbEUSfCYrgmY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 20:35:02 +0200 Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:35:02 +0100 (BST) Sender: "Maciej W. Rozycki" From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1431085311-24617-1-git-send-email-leon.alrae@imgtec.com> <1431085311-24617-3-git-send-email-leon.alrae@imgtec.com> <555C41BF.3070900@imgtec.com> <555DE45B.4030101@imgtec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] semihosting: add --semihosting-config arg sub-argument List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Liviu Ionescu Cc: Matthew Fortune , Peter Maydell , Leon Alrae , QEMU Developers , Christopher Covington On Thu, 21 May 2015, Liviu Ionescu wrote: > p.s. and I think there are major differences between using -append to > pass arguments to the kernel and passing arguments to semihosting, this > being one of the reasons for suggesting a new command. Out of curiosity, why do you think there are differences between passing arguments to `vmlinux' and any other bare-metal executable, or maybe more specifically what differences do you have in mind? Maciej