From: P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Qemu Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@360.cn>, qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] timer: a9gtimer: remove loop to auto-increment comparator
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:12:08 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1610131141320.2125@wniryva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8LfjDEMtbT5GRryLvAEu9kzbEzykKXF9DP+dDLajT8BQ@mail.gmail.com>
+-- On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Peter Maydell wrote --+
| > - while (gtb->compare < update.new) {
| > + if (gtb->compare < update.new) {
| >
| > + inc = update.new - gtb->compare - 1;
|
| Can you explain why the '- 1' here ?
I think I did that because while was running till gtb->compare < update.new.
To contain gtb->compare under update.new.
| Something still doesn't look right here. Consider the case where
| update.new is only just bigger than gtb->compare (actually the
| usual case, I think). In this case 'update.new - gtb->compare - 1'
| is smaller than gtb->inc and so the QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN will produce
| an inc value of 0. That would be wrong, because we should definitely
| have done an auto-increment.
Yes, but in those cases 'gtb->compare += inc' would exceed update.new. Is
that okay ?
Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-08 5:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] timer: a9gtimer: remove loop to auto-increment comparator P J P
2016-10-11 0:06 ` no-reply
2016-10-11 17:14 ` P J P
2016-10-12 1:00 ` Fam Zheng
2016-10-12 12:31 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-13 6:42 ` P J P [this message]
2016-10-13 10:44 ` Peter Maydell
2016-10-13 20:13 ` P J P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.20.1610131141320.2125@wniryva \
--to=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=liqiang6-s@360.cn \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).