From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NebTa-0008Gh-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:49:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38442 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NebTZ-0008GE-M5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:49:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NebTW-0007KU-Tn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:49:01 -0500 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:54134 helo=akado.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NebTW-0007JX-GQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:48:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:48:53 +0300 (MSK) From: malc Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [For stable-0.12] Sync OSS_GETVERSION handling with head In-Reply-To: <201002082028.o18KSJjX011676@triton8.kn-bremen.de> Message-ID: References: <20100117172339.GA34350@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <4B560922.3030705@codemonkey.ws> <201002082028.o18KSJjX011676@triton8.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juergen Lock Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Juergen Lock wrote: > In article you write: > >On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > >> On 01/17/2010 11:23 AM, Juergen Lock wrote: > >> > As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs > >> > OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits: > >> > > >> > 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed > >> > 6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3 > >> > > >> > 2. oss: fix fragment setting > >> > 3d709fe73a77c40e263b3af6e650fd4b519c3562 > >> > > >> > 3. Workaround for broken OSS_GETVERSION on FreeBSD, part two > >> > 72ff25e4e98d6dba9286d032b9ff5432553bbad5 > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock > >> > > >> > >> malc, please Ack. > > > >quack > > > >[..snip..] > > -qu? :) > > (Because I just noticed this is not in stable yet...) Okay, let's do it the hard way - I have nothing aginst the idea. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru