From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nyv1o-0005Fd-9e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:44:20 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60369 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nyv1m-0005Ex-SM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:44:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyv1l-0006Ng-Iw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:44:18 -0400 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:50434 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyv1l-0006Na-9Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:44:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 02:44:09 +0400 (MSD) From: malc Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Applied PATCH] Split TLB addend and target_phys_addr_t In-Reply-To: <3D8AED7A-94E9-4911-ABE1-0A09AFD325D5@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <201004050221.08284.paul@codesourcery.com> <3D8AED7A-94E9-4911-ABE1-0A09AFD325D5@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Paul Brook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 05.04.2010, at 14:41, malc wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Paul Brook wrote: > > > >> I think I got all the tcg backend bits right, but can't test most of them. Please test and report any problems. > >> > >> Historically the qemu tlb "addend" field was used for both RAM and IO accesses, > >> so needed to be able to hold both host addresses (unsigned long) and guest > >> physical addresses (target_phys_addr_t). However since the introduction of > >> the iotlb field it has only been used for RAM accesses. > >> > >> This means we can change the type of addend to unsigned long, and remove > >> associated hacks in the big-endian TCG backends. > >> > >> We can also remove the host dependence from target_phys_addr_t. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Paul Brook > > > > PPC32 seems to be operational. > > > > Alexander: Can you please test it a bit more thoroughly, my PPCs are a bit > > on the slow side. > > Test what exactly? Booting random guests with TCG on PPC? Booting 64 bit guests with 32 bit ppc hosts specifically. [Testing whether 64bit host still works would be nice too, thanks] -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru