From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43835 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OE88A-00032O-07
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:45:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <av1474@comtv.ru>) id 1OE883-0005VU-1y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:45:45 -0400
Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:58601 helo=akado.ru)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <av1474@comtv.ru>) id 1OE882-0005V6-Ru
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 17:45:39 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 01:45:27 +0400 (MSD)
From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add QEMU DirectFB display driver
In-Reply-To: <4BF1B866.3030605@codemonkey.ws>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1005180144200.2654@linmac>
References: <1273766038-16808-1-git-send-email-julian.pidancet@citrix.com>
	<201005160210.25323.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<4BF1A4FF.4020401@redhat.com> <4BF1A7C9.8030807@codemonkey.ws>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1005180130220.2537@linmac>
	<4BF1B866.3030605@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Julian Pidancet <julian.pidancet@citrix.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 17 May 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> On 05/17/2010 04:35 PM, malc wrote:
> > There's one thing that SDL does marvelously well - it's just one fairly
> > small and self contained library that doesn't unleash dependency hell on
> > the user.
> >    
> > > The fact that we have cocoa support in the tree is basically an admission
> > > of
> > > failure with SDL.
> > >      
> > I don't think so, the way i see it: someone had an itch (i.e. an
> > application that does not integrate well with his windowing environment)
> > and he scratched it.
> >    
> 
> SDL doesn't integrate well into a modern Gnome desktop either.  I don't see
> why we have Cocoa and not Gtk.  If the answer is, someone needs to send
> patches, expect patches soon :-)
> 

If those patches don't try to force Gnome on me (by removing SDL that is
and being optional) let them come.

-- 
mailto:av1474@comtv.ru