qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Andreas Gustafsson <gson@gson.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: fix cmpxchg instruction emulation
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:29:39 +0400 (MSK)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1112101427580.1709@linmac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111210095911.AE7BE75E5D@guava.gson.org>

On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:

> When the i386 cmpxchg instruction is executed with a memory operand
> and the comparison result is "unequal", do the memory write before
> changing the accumulator instead of the other way around, because
> otherwise the new accumulator value will incorrectly be used in the
> comparison when the instruction is restarted after a page fault.
> 
> This bug was originally reported on 2010-04-25 as
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/569760 

I'm starting to lose count on how many times this patch resurfaces here.
Please see http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/1XS1vaW9MlyMzguWl5fE
and the links in the thread.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gustafsson <gson@gson.org>
> ---
> --- translate.c.orig	2011-12-09 18:21:28.000000000 +0200
> +++ translate.c	2011-12-09 18:21:24.000000000 +0200
> @@ -4870,20 +4870,23 @@ static target_ulong disas_insn(DisasCont
>              tcg_gen_sub_tl(t2, cpu_regs[R_EAX], t0);
>              gen_extu(ot, t2);
>              tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, t2, 0, label1);
> +            label2 = gen_new_label();
>              if (mod == 3) {
> -                label2 = gen_new_label();
>                  gen_op_mov_reg_v(ot, R_EAX, t0);
>                  tcg_gen_br(label2);
>                  gen_set_label(label1);
>                  gen_op_mov_reg_v(ot, rm, t1);
> -                gen_set_label(label2);
>              } else {
> -                tcg_gen_mov_tl(t1, t0);
> +                /* perform no-op store cycle like physical cpu; must be
> +                   before changing accumulator to ensure idempotency if
> +                   the store faults and the instruction is restarted */
> +                gen_op_st_v(ot + s->mem_index, t0, a0);
>                  gen_op_mov_reg_v(ot, R_EAX, t0);
> +                tcg_gen_br(label2);
>                  gen_set_label(label1);
> -                /* always store */
>                  gen_op_st_v(ot + s->mem_index, t1, a0);
>              }
> +            gen_set_label(label2);
>              tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_cc_src, t0);
>              tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_cc_dst, t2);
>              s->cc_op = CC_OP_SUBB + ot;
> 

-- 
mailto:av1474@comtv.ru

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-10 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-10  9:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: fix cmpxchg instruction emulation Andreas Gustafsson
2011-12-10 10:29 ` malc [this message]
2011-12-10 11:51   ` Andreas Gustafsson
2011-12-10 12:34     ` malc
2011-12-10 14:15       ` Andreas Gustafsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1112101427580.1709@linmac \
    --to=av1474@comtv.ru \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=gson@gson.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).