From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38057) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarOA-000738-5N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:09:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarO6-0002GU-0T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:09:02 -0500 Received: from fe02x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.165]:55251 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarO5-0002FX-PX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:08:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:08:50 +0400 (MSK) From: malc In-Reply-To: <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> Message-ID: References: <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 904308] [NEW] x86: BT/BTS/BTR/BTC: ZF flag is unaffected List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Daniil Troshkov <904308@bugs.launchpad.net> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Daniil Troshkov wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Hello! > > Bug was found in qemu.git. > See target-i386/translate.c: > [..snip..] Intel's documentation doesn't cover this, AMD's says that ZF is undefined, so, question is: why do you think QEMU is wrong here? -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru