From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarbW-0007bu-Ai for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:22:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarbQ-0004Ah-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:22:50 -0500 Received: from fe02x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.165]:62755 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarbQ-0004AZ-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:22:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:22:40 +0400 (MSK) From: malc In-Reply-To: <4EE8CC59.4080100@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> <4EE8CC59.4080100@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 904308] [NEW] x86: BT/BTS/BTR/BTC: ZF flag is unaffected List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Daniil Troshkov <904308@bugs.launchpad.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/14/2011 06:08 PM, malc wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Daniil Troshkov wrote: > > > > > Public bug reported: > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > Bug was found in qemu.git. > > > See target-i386/translate.c: > > > > > > > [..snip..] > > > > Intel's documentation doesn't cover this, AMD's says that ZF is undefined, so, > > question is: why do you think QEMU is wrong here? > > The Intel documentation states that ZF is unaffected. > Right, i was blind, anyways, AMD disagrees. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru