From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFmCV-0007fR-SN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:54:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFmCR-0003vM-0m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:54:07 -0400 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:61007 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SFmCQ-0003vB-QQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:54:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:53:48 +0400 (MSK) From: malc In-Reply-To: <4F7D921E.9040003@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <6e10c02cbb87fe30703de848455593df41ec7f4b.1333623555.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <4F7D887B.1030104@siemens.com> <4F7D921E.9040003@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/10] Introduce qemu_cond_timedwait for POSIX List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf , Jan Kiszka , Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Peter Maydell On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/04/2012 14:30, malc ha scritto: > >> > Would save that "* 1000". I just wondered why we do not use it elsewhere > >> > in QEMU and was reluctant to risk some BSD breakage. > >> > > > It's probably worth mentioning that using anything other than > > clock_gettime and CLOCK_MONOTONING (as well as setting proper pthread > > clock attr on the condition variable) is prone to the surprises (such > > as NTP corrections and daylight saving changes). > > I was about to suggest the same, but how widespread is support for > pthread_condattr_setclock? If it's not all is lost anyway. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru