From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4sbJ-0001Zg-2u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4sbH-0007Mp-Qd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:02:57 -0400 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:60466 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4sbH-0007MZ-J9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:02:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:02:50 +0400 (MSK) From: malc In-Reply-To: <503714B0.1020404@web.de> Message-ID: References: <1345703083-25322-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> <503714B0.1020404@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Running Microport UNIX (ca 1987) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Matthew Ogilvie , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-08-24 05:58, malc wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote: > > > >> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can > >> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987) > >> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM) > >> > >> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See > >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=15654 > >> > >> The patches are all independent, except that the documentation part > >> of patch 5 (vga) adds onto patch 4 (retrace=) changes. > > > > [..snip..] > > > > Applied, thanks. > > Err, does this comply with the -rcX process? Patch 6 alone has been on > the list for less than a day. Only now I was able to comment on it, and > I would prefer to not have it merged that easily. > Where's the process documented? As for patch 6 i confess i haven't paid enough attention and was under impression that this set was mainly about adjusting the comment about mov crN behavior. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru