From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T600V-0003RD-Bk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:09:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T600U-0000Vv-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:09:35 -0400 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:58992 helo=akado.ru) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T600U-0000Vq-28 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:09:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:09:26 +0400 (MSK) From: malc In-Reply-To: <87ipc4a1g8.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Message-ID: References: <1345703083-25322-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> <87ipc4a1g8.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Running Microport UNIX (ca 1987) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Matthew Ogilvie , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote: > malc writes: > > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Matthew Ogilvie wrote: > > > >> After applying this version 2 of this patch series, I can > >> successfully run "Micoport UNIX System V/386, v 2.1" (ca 1987) > >> under qemu. (although not if I try to enable KVM) > >> > >> Version 1 of this series was posted about 4 weeks ago. See > >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=15654 > >> > >> The patches are all independent, except that the documentation part > >> of patch 5 (vga) adds onto patch 4 (retrace=) changes. > > > > [..snip..] > > > > Applied, thanks. > > malc, please revert these patches. > > They were not adequately reviewed and they also do not qualify for the > stage of the release we're in. Number 2 was, and should stay, as the emulation wasn't correct before it, don't really care about the rest. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru