From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTFY9-0004N3-Ph for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:01:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTFY3-0005DZ-E8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:01:13 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:21614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTFY3-0005D7-7k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:01:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:00:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Keith Busch In-Reply-To: <53345367.2040402@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <1394648907-20096-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1394648907-20096-13-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <5320B396.20005@suse.de> <53345367.2040402@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-194211640-1395946835=:4731" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next v3 12/15] nvme: Permit zero-length block devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Keith Busch , Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-194211640-1395946835=:4731 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 12.03.2014 21:13, schrieb Keith Busch: >> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Tonight is Hard Freeze for 2.0. If you could also review the matching >>> test case http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/329627/ I would put both in >>> my pull. >> >> Looks great! I'd apply the new test case, but it won't without the >> previous "pvpanic-test" patch in your series. > > I had held off putting them in my pull for -rc0, but not seeing > patches/pull from your side I am queuing them now for -rc1. Can I > formalize your review as an Acked-by of both, if not turn your > Signed-off-by into a Reviewed-by for this patch here? Sounds good to me. Acked-by: Keith Busch --8323328-194211640-1395946835=:4731--