qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>,
	Julian Ganz <neither@nut.email>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Alexandre Iooss" <erdnaxe@crans.org>,
	"Mahmoud Mandour" <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 11/11] tests: add plugin asserting correctness of discon event's to_pc
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:42:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b02abe90-d57b-4010-aace-1b47d92e5c26@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <867d8a3a-ddf4-4655-9bfc-51c1a2ad8203@linaro.org>

On 12/6/24 13:02, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> On 12/6/24 00:42, Julian Ganz wrote:
>> Hi Pierrick,
>>
>> December 5, 2024 at 11:28 PM, "Pierrick Bouvier" wrote:
>>> On 12/5/24 13:22, Julian Ganz wrote:
>>>>   December 5, 2024 at 6:30 PM, "Pierrick Bouvier" wrote:
>>>>> We can store the next_expected pc for each instruction (from current_instruction + 
>>>>> insn_length), and we should be able to compare that with the expected from_pc.
>>>>>   This is mostly what contrib/plugins/cflow.c does.
>>>>>
>>>>>   With that, we can test from_pc.
>>>>>
>>>>   I'm not confident that this will work reliably for branch, jump and
>>>>   other "interesting" instructions. But I can have a closer look at the
>>>>   cflow plugin and try to figure out how that plugin handles those cases.
>>>>
>>> It won't work for latest instructions in a tb (because we don't know what will be the 
>>> next one), but should be good for all the others cases.
>>
>> IIUC qemu will schedule interrupts "opportunistically" between tb
>> executions. If that's the case we'll observe interrupts exclusively
>> after the last instruction in a tb. That strikes me as a serious
>> limitation.
>>
> 
> To reuse fancy vocabulary, maybe we should have a distinction between inferable 
> interruptions (interrupt instruction) and uninferable interrupts, triggered by an external 
> event.
> 
> In the latter, it *might* be acceptable to not provide a from_pc (let's say a value 0), 
> because there is no useful information in itself, except creating random edges in the 
> control flow graph, which we don't want to do.
> 
> What do you think of it?

I think you both are over-complicating things.

Always, env->pc (or whatever) within cc->cpu_exec_interrupt *is* where the interrupt is 
recognized, and *is* where the discontinuity occurs.  Report that.

Just because some device interrupts are deferred to the end of the TB, that makes no 
difference.  There is no "right" answer for timing between execution and asynchronous 
interrupts.


r~


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-02 19:26 [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] tcg-plugins: add hooks for discontinuities Julian Ganz
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/11] plugins: add types for callbacks related to certain discontinuities Julian Ganz
2024-12-03  8:45   ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 22:41     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 12:40       ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 17:56         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 21:50           ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 22:14             ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 23:03             ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-06  8:58               ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-06 18:59                 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-07 13:38                   ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-09 18:52                     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-04 22:45   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 12:44     ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 17:35       ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 21:25         ` Julian Ganz
2025-01-09 13:52     ` Alex Bennée
2025-01-09 22:28       ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-10 11:43       ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/11] plugins: add API for registering discontinuity callbacks Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 22:45   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-09 13:57   ` Alex Bennée
2025-01-10 11:40     ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/11] plugins: add hooks for new discontinuity related callbacks Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 22:47   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-09 13:58   ` Alex Bennée
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/11] contrib/plugins: add plugin showcasing new dicontinuity related API Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 23:14   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 13:00     ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 17:23       ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-09 14:04   ` Alex Bennée
2025-01-09 22:10     ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-10 11:49     ` Julian Ganz
2025-01-10 15:15       ` Alex Bennée
2025-01-10 21:02         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-11 12:15           ` Alex Bennée
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/11] target/alpha: call plugin trap callbacks Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 22:48   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/11] target/arm: " Julian Ganz
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/11] target/avr: " Julian Ganz
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/11] target/mips: " Julian Ganz
2025-01-09 13:43   ` Alex Bennée
2024-12-02 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/11] target/riscv: " Julian Ganz
2024-12-03  4:39   ` Alistair Francis
2024-12-02 19:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/11] target/sparc: " Julian Ganz
2025-01-09 13:46   ` Alex Bennée
2024-12-02 19:41 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/11] tests: add plugin asserting correctness of discon event's to_pc Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 23:33   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 13:10     ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 17:30       ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-05 21:22         ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-05 22:28           ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-06  8:42             ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-06 19:02               ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-06 19:42                 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2024-12-06 20:40                   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-06 22:56                     ` Richard Henderson
2024-12-07 13:47                       ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-07 13:41                   ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-20 11:47     ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-20 21:17       ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-12-20 21:46         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-09 16:35         ` Alex Bennée
2025-01-09 16:33       ` Alex Bennée
2025-01-09 22:27         ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-10 11:58         ` Julian Ganz
2024-12-03  8:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] tcg-plugins: add hooks for discontinuities Julian Ganz
2024-12-04 22:51   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-01-09 16:43 ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b02abe90-d57b-4010-aace-1b47d92e5c26@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=erdnaxe@crans.org \
    --cc=ma.mandourr@gmail.com \
    --cc=neither@nut.email \
    --cc=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).