From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8E4C10DCE for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1076724655 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 04:29:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1076724655 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=users.sourceforge.jp Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53358 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBWW3-0006kd-8n for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:29:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBWVV-0006MA-HZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:28:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBWVU-0006Vc-HQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:28:41 -0400 Received: from mail03.asahi-net.or.jp ([202.224.55.15]:42262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBWVU-0006Qg-9X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:28:40 -0400 Received: from sakura.ysato.name (ik1-413-38519.vs.sakura.ne.jp [153.127.30.23]) (Authenticated sender: PQ4Y-STU) by mail03.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 66366E5A40; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:28:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from www.ysato.name (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sakura.ysato.name (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EBDC41C0DCD; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:28:36 +0900 (JST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:28:36 +0900 From: Yoshinori Sato To: Eric Blake Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Add RX target. In-Reply-To: References: <20200308130637.37651-1-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Message-ID: X-Sender: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 202.224.55.15 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, philmd@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" 2020-03-10 00:07 =E3=81=AB Eric Blake =E3=81=95=E3=82=93=E3=81=AF=E6=9B=B8= =E3=81=8D=E3=81=BE=E3=81=97=E3=81=9F: > On 3/8/20 8:06 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: >> Add rx-virt target specificaion document. >=20 > specification >=20 >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato >> --- >> docs/system/target-rx.rst | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> docs/system/targets.rst | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 docs/system/target-rx.rst >>=20 >> diff --git a/docs/system/target-rx.rst b/docs/system/target-rx.rst >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000000..8540fd5218 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/docs/system/target-rx.rst >> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >> +.. _RX-System-emulator: >> + >> +RX System emulator >> +-------------------- >> + >> +Use the executable ``qemu-system-rx`` to simulate a Virtual RX=20 >> target. >> +This target emulated following devices. >=20 > s/emulated/emulates the/ >=20 OK. I'll fix it. >=20 >> +++ b/docs/system/targets.rst >> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ Contents: >> target-arm >> target-m68k >> target-xtensa >> + target-rx >=20 > Is it worth keeping this list alphabetically sorted? It was not in alphabetical order, it was added at the last. Is it better=20 to arrange in alphabetical order? --- Yoshinori Sato