From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA30C352AA for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DE820842 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="UMQ8zBfP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 75DE820842 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJcb-0002YQ-Gz for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:59:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJbp-00023M-3F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:58:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJbn-0001Fo-EO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:58:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]:39519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFJbm-0001DN-Se for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 10:58:35 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id v4so8189336pff.6 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:58:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/JL+zK5aB05w59Mhh8gwF+qq5BJ2HD/AYUdSpTxnNjY=; b=UMQ8zBfPOToVJLve+NOXc1Wt34sVlASxStZZy4u9CInuLQgyEmTl6uw6cJ983b4ldS W5823qYifukAkdAIakS1JN1FJ7PY7bnU4Ao/W6YlQT15Zfl+I2gRDvncWpmNEEi6WlMX W/Ot9xDiKqXuP3U2sjuIYP0R36z7prnCHv3apNBBKowtjGeIsgnst3J6SOstJbWtICep r2FPaQB8EMFA14IZHfLq4XgjAlh/0vmYDpTArFwrMfhjc20POkcxp2XqW68IY26rpKdv 1I8cAyuTyGAGzzi8EDWZkgtkRv/f5q+iQHk9AHSeL1JCnmvJmVbUlq3fRNZz2KORpZh+ xZZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/JL+zK5aB05w59Mhh8gwF+qq5BJ2HD/AYUdSpTxnNjY=; b=txlyAdw/br0XzXIRmGMEv6jgg+Kxi9JSt42ORsaBNySkZYa1NgwWv4Crtph9QYJ2DL xpup785HIoFdfRoSL83Y+EA5AnnjKFVVjUiY6Jltg0xMaMJUa3Rqj/ikXs3jtg3lIh0O MSS4vF3W5eCPGFLyNbsmqgvQ9CbhsB9GaNbi85nSvXYQn6IoCPmkGIOVG4GnRgC5IeFq QOoy28bdBzrjB5swe5pYyidHoYvy8228lwSxAGjqvxwBWMSDUDrpbsNOMa8N5KtI8uSW /dKKARmid6M6nM4myxMxdDT3CndBHaRtDwjLbO7ZdaNz3pnD41AfjTgqj5Nq95Ak22+w 0B0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXgLwJ3Rs7G+9OzXnmUBnLHHM9f1CsK+WaJGVVcBXmvR5rG/uIt WfSVYVp8cfuOG5T7Hwf4Bumsag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxwTLXIJiVNlJJ0gRcdTUB4TEJllO1bxiVNvTHJHNgAE1c8059L3pZFPKheG9TTtedmQ+DnDQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9ab5:: with SMTP id x21mr27768245pfi.252.1569941913690; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (97-113-7-119.tukw.qwest.net. [97.113.7.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f62sm19014436pfg.74.2019.10.01.07.58.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] user-exec: Do not filter the signal on si_code To: Laurent Vivier , Peter Maydell References: <20190930192931.20509-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <7315e0ed-0d33-e998-1dc4-01664c300723@vivier.eu> From: Richard Henderson Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:58:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::442 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 10/1/19 6:15 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 01/10/2019 à 13:46, Peter Maydell a écrit : >> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 12:19, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> Is it possible to update the farm to Centos 8? >>> >>> Or as the kernel involved is specifically for POWER9, is it possible to >>> use only POWER8? >> >> My experience is that the gcc cfarm admins aren't in >> principle against the idea of upgrading farm machines, >> but in practice they tend to have a shortage of effort. >> If there's a centos-7-kernel-update package that could >> be installed without doing a full distro upgrade that >> would probably be pretty easy to ask them to arrange. > > It seems Centos provides a 4.18 kernel for POWER9 on Centos 7: > > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/os/power9/Packages/kernel-4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le.rpm Thanks guys. I've sent a message to the admins asking for an update on gcc135. r~