From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYdn7-0006s5-J4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:08:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYdn4-0000Qg-6X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:08:33 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYdn3-0000QX-W5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:08:30 -0500 References: <1484739954-86833-1-git-send-email-phil@philjordan.eu> <20170118175335-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20170118181918.783cb7bd@nial.brq.redhat.com> <20170131165802-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20170131201333-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:08:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170131201333-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] acpi: add reset register to fadt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Phil Dennis-Jordan , Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost On 01/31/17 19:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 05:28:57PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> The ACPI 6.1 spec says, >> >> - DSDT: [...] If the X_DSDT field contains a non-zero value then this >> field must be zero. >> - X_DSDT: [...] If the DSDT field contains a non-zero value then this >> field must be zero. > > But that's only 6.1. 6.0 and earlier did not say this. > The errata they wanted to address was: > 1393 In FADT: if X_DSDT field is non-zero, DSDT > field should be ignored or deprecated > > I would class this as a spec bug. > Process-wise, that's not a bad idea; it could be the only way (or the best way) to argue for a corresponding change in edk2's EFI_ACPI_TABLE_PROTOCOL implementation (MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/AcpiTableDxe). Do you want to raise this on the ASWG list? I vaguely recall that you subscribed; if not, I think you should be able to, as a Red Hatter . (I'd like to avoid being the middle man.) Hm... It seems that the "Adopter Membership" is free, which could be appropriate for individual observers: http://uefi.org/join http://members.uefi.org/home/ (Should Phil consider it.) Thanks Laszlo