From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G5x3O-0001g2-0k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:54 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1G5x3K-0001fc-KD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:53 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5x3K-0001fY-Cy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:00:50 -0400
Received: from [64.233.182.191] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G5x50-0008MI-Dg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:02:34 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so30642nfc
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b2fa41d60607262100l100b84e0r20704ece0215d936@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:00:48 +0400
From: "Igor Kovalenko" <igor.v.kovalenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 0.8.2 and win64
In-Reply-To: <F7F148C986A2A84F930FEB8C3B169EA002FBC8A1@OPDMEXO01.omnitel.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_11147_24509304.1153972848780"
References: <F7F148C986A2A84F930FEB8C3B169EA002FBC8A1@OPDMEXO01.omnitel.it>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

------=_Part_11147_24509304.1153972848780
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/26/06, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT <Frediano.Ziglio@vodafone.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>   as expected 0.8.2 make windows 64 works. There is however a small
> problem with network card. Windows 64 do not support old ne card so I
> used rtl8139. It seems that 8139plus card make windows enter in an
> infinite loop at shutdown. Changing pci id from 0x20 to 0x10 (that is
> use old 8139, not plus) make the card work. I'm unable to find windows
> driver for pcnet so I'm unable to try it. Just to make it happy I wrote
> this patch that add a rtl8139too card. It simply change pci revision id
> but use rtl8139 code.


Do you have debugging logs available? I'm interested in fixing the C+ mode
without adding 8139too option.

------=_Part_11147_24509304.1153972848780
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 7/26/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:Frediano.Ziglio@vodafone.com">Frediano.Ziglio@vodafone.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;as expected 0.8.2 make windows 64 works. There is however a small<br>problem with network card. Windows 64 do not support old ne card so I<br>used rtl8139. It seems that 8139plus card make windows enter in an<br>
infinite loop at shutdown. Changing pci id from 0x20 to 0x10 (that is<br>use old 8139, not plus) make the card work. I'm unable to find windows<br>driver for pcnet so I'm unable to try it. Just to make it happy I wrote<br>
this patch that add a rtl8139too card. It simply change pci revision id<br>but use rtl8139 code.</blockquote><div><br>Do you have debugging logs available? I'm interested in fixing the C+ mode without adding 8139too option.
<br><br></div></div>

------=_Part_11147_24509304.1153972848780--