From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfreiman@redhat.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Implement network booting directly into the s390-ccw BIOS
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:56:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4bba4e4-0d69-095e-5fe2-0042bc414093@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <589b8e71-b025-a0ad-0621-d6827e31c90d@suse.de>
On 27.06.2017 23:15, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 27.06.17 13:48, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...]
>> - The code only supports TFTP (via UDP) ... I think that is OK for
>> most use-cases, but if we ever want to support network booting
>> via HTTP or something else that is based on TCP, we would need to
>> use something else instead... Should we maybe rather head towards
>> grub2, petitboot or something different instead?
>
> IMHO the only viable next step would be to support UEFI and build on top
> of that - either by porting edk2 or U-Boot to s390x.
I can't speak of U-Boot, but you certainly don't want to port edk2 to a
big endian machine. Been there, seen that.
> The problem with solutions like petitboot or home grown grub2 targets is
> that it becomes a documentation and knowledge sharing nightmare down the
> road. The less we're different from everyone else, the easier it becomes
> to maintain s390x.
petitboot is basically a Linux system (with a shell, too). And grub2 is
also a common boot loader on x86 nowadays ... so not sure whether they
would really be a knowledge sharing nightmare? I think they would be
more common for "server" people than the U-Boot loader, which is likely
only familiar to "embedded" folks.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-27 11:48 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Implement network booting directly into the s390-ccw BIOS Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add the libc from the SLOF firmware Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 15:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-27 22:14 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Start using the libc from SLOF Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add a write() function for stdio Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add implementation of sbrk() Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add the TFTP network loading stack from SLOF Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/14] libnet: Remove remainders of netsave code Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/14] libnet: Rework error message printing Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/14] libnet: Refactor some code of netload() into a separate function Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Make the basic libnet code compilable Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add timer code for the libnet Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add virtio-net driver code Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 12/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Load file via an intermediate .INS file Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 13/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Allow loading to address 0 Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 14/14] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Wire up the netload code Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 15:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/14] Implement network booting directly into the s390-ccw BIOS David Hildenbrand
2017-06-27 15:50 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2017-06-27 21:40 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-28 7:28 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2017-06-28 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-28 10:56 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-28 15:02 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2017-06-29 7:58 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-29 8:10 ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2017-06-27 16:50 ` Farhan Ali
2017-06-28 7:34 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-27 21:15 ` Alexander Graf
2017-06-27 21:56 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2017-06-28 8:06 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-06-28 7:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 8:59 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-29 8:17 ` Thomas Huth
2017-06-29 8:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4bba4e4-0d69-095e-5fe2-0042bc414093@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jfreiman@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).