Re: illegal hardware instruction during MIPS-I ELF linux useremulation

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>]

On 9/24/19 3:31 PM, Libo Zhou wrote:
>>> I would start by using the QEMU gdbstub to connect a
>>> MIPS-aware gdb. Then when the SIGILL arrives you can see
>>> what instruction the guest program was trying to execute.
> 
>> Just tried it and found something interesting.
>> I connected gdb-multiarch to QEMU gdbstub. gdb-multiarch's architecture was set to mips:3000 automatically (and Wikipedia says r3k uses MIPS-I).
> 
>> When I did 'layout asm', and compared the instructions displayed against test.s generated by my mipsel-linux-unknown-gcc, they appeared to be a little bit different.
> 
>> The 'store word' instruction in test.s is shown as a hex '0x7f......(don't remember the rest)';
>> 'load word' is shown as '0x5f......';
>> 'load immediate' is seen as 'addi';
>> 'j' as 'jr';
> 
>> When I single-stepped the instructions, the SIGILL was thrown immediately after the first unrecognized 0x7f......, which is supposed to be a store word (sw).
> 
>> Hence, can I conclude that MIPS-I is not implemented in QEMU out of the box? Or is it possible that my compiler doesn't implement MIPS-I correctly?
> 
> More updates about this. I just disassembled the unrecognized hex by hand, and figured out that the store word and load word opcodes are not the same as specified in translate.c. While the remaining fields of those unrecognized instructions do match with the source and destination registers.

What is your compiler/assembler versions (on both machines you used)?