From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghFRN-0002R8-EO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:06:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghFRM-0000XX-Q1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:06:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghFRM-0000Wi-HU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:06:44 -0500 References: <1547043869-10520-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <20190109143122.GR3998@redhat.com> <21c94e77-ad1d-3ce2-72cd-fc86f6d619fc@redhat.com> <20190109145820.GV3998@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:06:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190109145820.GV3998@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] configure: Force the C standard to gnu99 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P._Berrang=c3=a9?=" Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , pbonzini@redhat.com On 2019-01-09 15:58, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:51:33PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 2019-01-09 15:31, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: [...] >>> We could consider also setting a suitable -std for CXXFLAGS too in fu= ture >>> though... >> >> Shall I send a v3 with "-std=3Dgnu++98" (which seems to be the only us= able >> option right now), or shall we wait until we really hit a problem with >> the C++ code? >=20 > I'd have a slight preference for adding a C++ suitable -std now > just to give us a more predictable build setup. I think that's my preference, too. I'll send a v3... Thomas