From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04FFC433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A966146D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:42:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 35A966146D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH0bv-0001BH-PI for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 03:42:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH0ak-0000hv-HS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 03:41:18 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:23732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lH0ah-00026s-24 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 03:41:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614674473; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pQm+CDv9mXM9U2rY83Z74WpJTY59iKljmUcmEdMRA7A=; b=R60ic8kKTM1eFV5IeGDeSEl56DwvLdivjF8m9gyVXYAjwex14UhW2WwPN832Cp0RlTcrcI GdyX16pxm02qFOk6XhLiEWMGzynpbmo6FlOACUDt2QJlmWcBJgkI5p59DusK6NnxWijRIw UMWK9ToUoj3uoB/fyGLU7B7blhuqC2I= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-23-apD4-tbZMTCU8kKZW_yPUg-1; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 03:41:09 -0500 X-MC-Unique: apD4-tbZMTCU8kKZW_yPUg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BDE193578E; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-114-150.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.150]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E3D5D9E2; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386/acpi: fix inconsistent QEMU/OVMF device paths To: Igor Mammedov References: <20200730155755.188845-1-mst@redhat.com> <5b40e1ac-03ca-7954-4d50-f5f96c339772@proxmox.com> <20210228154208-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20210301142819.66b94a4e@redhat.com> <20210301111254-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <14c5dafe-ac7c-d1c9-ba51-325a3a0252a7@redhat.com> <20210301200834.2def369a@redhat.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:40:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210301200834.2def369a@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: vit9696 , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Reiter , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Richard Henderson , Thomas Lamprecht , Eduardo Habkost Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 03/01/21 20:08, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:28:05 +0100 > Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> On 03/01/21 17:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> >>>> How about: >>>> * buggy ACPI for 5.1 machine types and older >>>> * fixed ACPI for 5.2 and newer? >>> >>> Exactly. >> >> Sounds OK to me as well (even though it's quite unfortunate that this is >> one of those exceptions that require us to version the ACPI generator). > it is unfortunate, and I do resist to such changes usually. > in this case, I fill avoiding complaints/bug reports justifies such exception. Right, thanks. Laszlo