From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74483C433FE for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 21:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46064 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFjjn-000520-B2 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:33:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFjhm-0002Ny-54 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:31:50 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032] (port=36364 helo=mail-pj1-x1032.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFjhk-0002Kk-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:31:49 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id h20-20020a17090adb9400b001b518bf99ffso11237085pjv.1 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:31:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rXmYbwNl7Kr/ivvsZOena3yb6vA2NKitQcHiSKWGftQ=; b=dyHmITmx3uoUuzdMAVbFFktcralPR5K2XX2Y7nJP6re9xCcdevIKlATTNrQTJ3QozB bWe0RQqLTiUhx4iJL2mJTyS2M3BDzwfA0OU9TiYq6sPFyJ1BixC4TiOq9/kZ+Xg9rHuU A0zzZK7KpDcAPrR8EAal02BmPclIa8l4ruWZwOK6G362s473VUysg6onHRPkLa4E/A6u N87in5b8wQdlIcdRFzT4LmXT97G5Kj4d28LjgQ8oHJgKVnJ7OLTxsOc3GudLhLY/MqHp Bx8nUKnudw76OluXDy4AR0IvER/PrYe6JZbUmBlUoP54DQ15lsegpCneVWlhaH2A3FZG WbaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rXmYbwNl7Kr/ivvsZOena3yb6vA2NKitQcHiSKWGftQ=; b=SaOmV+n5YrgAwphv5sOeSk+WEhWjl7KAugmokxSxBUTCdq/NrRa7+r5tTtaFKOufQe LKJA/MkIchL1s6IqoSQnsuvJhWxVOcGisEGjOroffAy3YAPeRyMBZuEDg9VJVspj0H+G BTvK6qprS20LiviTXMk1QDLqZCaOPilV+atgTK4bF5HjGn4hptlO7gprWK+PCEQWinj9 jdXWrrVNcNELlXdckK6mksmd4wwn91R9PfbyvwfTxr2q5Jwci0v9PUbSomQh/uRQVFyR J+XozCYy+5hrcARs+JIuhmE2l2jkJAg61D1cqkmWWQ3JwHt/lh54sxYtZtJxdT+1ZCDS Mx4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LQKdx1pv28i03JtoCDix9as/er8CFNYI3nHriKS0Hlt3wE9KC onRVtGngSuYg+SsyzBTGOn40LQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/ZZdMTi92q1eifwVYbfKBo3seLZ5/OmV9XaVW+IajzzWPtzJcubbnLRDD+pEU7mEnfASLAA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:244d:: with SMTP id l13mr36755727pls.142.1643923906022; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:31:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:8003:3a49:fd00:e4a0:3bb7:a616:35c9? ([2001:8003:3a49:fd00:e4a0:3bb7:a616:35c9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mu13sm12755359pjb.28.2022.02.03.13.31.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:31:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:31:38 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] improve coverage of vector backend Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , Taylor Simpson References: <20220202191242.652607-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <87k0ecvoxu.fsf@linaro.org> <87pmo3sut4.fsf@linaro.org> <87leyrst2m.fsf@linaro.org> <87h79fsor3.fsf@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson In-Reply-To: <87h79fsor3.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032; envelope-from=richard.henderson@linaro.org; helo=mail-pj1-x1032.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "fam@euphon.net" , "berrange@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "f4bug@amsat.org" , "qemu-arm@nongnu.org" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "crosa@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "aurelien@aurel32.net" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2/4/22 07:00, Alex Bennée wrote: >>> Does: >>> >>> #if BYTE_ORDER == BIG_ENDIAN >>> >>> work for your compiler? >> >> No, but this does >> #if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ >> >> With that change in the source, the tests passes. Will that work for >> other targets? > > At least not hppa-linux-user. The joy of having no standard compile time > way to report byte order in the C standard despite most things needing > to know one way or another. > > Richard, > > Any ideas? I see you're not explicitly including . I would expect that to be of some use. r~