From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC691C4360C for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 07:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1AC206CD for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 07:23:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D1AC206CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJBkg-0001VQ-Qn for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 03:23:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJBk1-000166-6l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 03:23:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJBk0-0003Pt-0N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 03:23:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJBjz-0003Pd-Ol for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 03:23:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB54862A for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 07:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id w2so5525397wrn.4 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 00:23:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v2LMwy6POXfv4gzizTfVGwXVreuBOTbhgRJQ669+H6o=; b=nFosfvYA5EnhhYnQFNGvxmN3Pd71tv6gLnzlkOYD5rAt4gZTTE/s8EbiPdhPuGeRse ikbqKC7elktPpYW2VlPx4ExUfubLX0FOnzjly5iOpEwGVJuR01BUOUXAzZgjshNwlZcP XW8MuzMMAczw7TTkL3zgv+zQUFuDyiLLTv/4hG2/jeinUM+6+OOdoEZP83I+bAC0VpQE KWbXbvbC4comb5yWhK70O2cAfc8VqxY/KHd2RpA8pito1mVc3Tp1Sk0czglKCdUDJi1k oZfxt89heZh7y+KA+MnWWbiDqGU3R5BG9fPiwYfUDrMor4is9rT0KPnR2WKzZ2hOregW qEiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVgcPZJHptvudsAOcRcaJcoMicJ/kpJFFx753B/bMCUvYO8U6Mh U2qns+4dZTxBxZ/G+Os228tNolK3QrgA7X9BJqEg0TueXJ35wiKHgTjJhN+cIQ0qkim3xUmKrMa f88Qs5hrtGXrqZco= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f417:: with SMTP id z23mr6484495wma.77.1570864981276; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 00:23:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQoiGnFm4sd9lpGCImemXhiXk4gMRhQ9sUsYoFQe1U27FH7VdEfvzVy4hCZmDjbGii+IoP3A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f417:: with SMTP id z23mr6484477wma.77.1570864981072; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 00:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (46.red-83-42-66.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.42.66.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q192sm13023573wme.23.2019.10.12.00.22.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Oct 2019 00:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v29 1/8] target/avr: Add outward facing interfaces and core CPU logic To: Sarah Harris , Thomas Huth References: <20190824184635.34192-1-mrolnik@gmail.com> <20190824184635.34192-2-mrolnik@gmail.com> <55f37e1b-8ed3-b295-0298-4299279e4043@redhat.com> <54f5b717-4864-9e42-155e-a2ab2e041f02@redhat.com> <20190827115954.d2f925de4c0f7c063a7e7131@kent.ac.uk> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:22:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190827115954.d2f925de4c0f7c063a7e7131@kent.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Henderson , Igor Mammedov , Michael Rolnik , QEMU Developers , Pavel Dovgalyuk Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 8/27/19 12:59 PM, Sarah Harris wrote: > I don't mind if you want to drop my signed-off-by for commits that were= based on Michael's work. > You probably want to keep my sign-off for the USART/timer commit though= as that was new code. Linux offers a Co-developed-by, some QEMU developers started to use it. Co-developed-by: states that the patch was co-created by multiple developers; it is a used to give attribution to co-authors (in addition to the author attributed by the From: tag) when several people work on a single patch. Since Co-developed-by: denotes authorship, every Co-developed-by: must be immediately followed by a Signed-off-by: of the associated co-author. Standard sign-off procedure applies, i.e. the ordering of Signed-off-by: tags should reflect the chronological history of the patch insofar as possible, regardless of whether the author is attributed via From: or Co-developed-by:. Notably, the last Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer submitting the patch. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#wh= en-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by >=20 > Regards, > Sarah Harris >=20 > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:00:51 +0200 > Thomas Huth wrote: >=20 >> On 26/08/2019 09.53, Michael Rolnik wrote: >>> the commit was originally mine. Then Sarah rearranged it, signed and >>> submitted. She no longer maintains it. So' I believe I can remove her= sob. >>> what do=C2=A0you think?. >> >> Fine for me, but maybe you should mention her in the patch description >> if she made significant changes? >> >> Sarah, what do you think? >> >> Anyway, if the patch is originally from you, you should also remove th= e >> "From: Sarah ..." line from the patch. For this, you likely have to >> change the author of the patch in your git tree with "git commit --ame= nd >> --reset-author". >> >> Thomas