From: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390x: Add Full Boot Order Support
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 23:58:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b650a629-6f0b-41fd-93e3-87de48feba94@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf48d601-0686-4ebd-a113-1357441db61d@redhat.com>
On 6/7/24 2:19 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/06/2024 21.22, Jared Rossi wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/5/24 4:02 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 29/05/2024 17.43, jrossi@linux.ibm.com wrote:
>>>> From: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patch set primarily adds support for the specification of
>>>> multiple boot
>>>> devices, allowing for the guest to automatically use an alternative
>>>> device on
>>>> a failed boot without needing to be reconfigured. It additionally
>>>> provides the
>>>> ability to define the loadparm attribute on a per-device bases,
>>>> which allows
>>>> boot devices to use different loadparm values if needed.
>>>>
>>>> In brief, an IPLB is generated for each designated boot device (up
>>>> to a maximum
>>>> of 8) and stored in guest memory immediately before BIOS. If a
>>>> device fails to
>>>> boot, the next IPLB is retrieved and we jump back to the start of
>>>> BIOS.
>>>>
>>>> Devices can be specified using the standard qemu device tag
>>>> "bootindex" as with
>>>> other architectures. Lower number indices are tried first, with
>>>> "bootindex=0"
>>>> indicating the first device to try.
>>>
>>> Is this supposed with multiple scsi-hd devices, too? I tried to boot
>>> a guest with two scsi disks (attached to a single virtio-scsi-ccw
>>> adapter) where only the second disk had a bootable installation, but
>>> that failed...?
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Yes, I would expect that to work. I tried to reproduce this using a
>> non-bootable scsi disk as the first boot device and then a known-good
>> bootable scsi disk as the second boot device, with one controller.
>> In my instance the BIOS was not able to identify the first disk as
>> bootable and so that device failed to IPL, but it did move on to the
>> next disk after that, and the guest successfully IPL'd from the
>> second device.
>>
>> When you say it failed, do you mean the first disk failed to boot (as
>> expected), but then the guest died without attempting to boot from
>> the second disk? Or did something else happen? I am either not
>> understanding your configuration or I am not understanding your error.
>
> I did this:
>
> $ ./qemu-system-s390x -bios pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.img -accel kvm \
> -device virtio-scsi-ccw -drive if=none,id=d2,file=/tmp/bad.qcow2 \
> -device scsi-hd,drive=d2,bootindex=2 \
> -drive if=none,id=d8,file=/tmp/good.qcow2 \
> -device scsi-hd,drive=d8,bootindex=3 -m 4G -nographic
> LOADPARM=[ ]
> Using virtio-scsi.
> Using guessed DASD geometry.
> Using ECKD scheme (block size 512), CDL
> No zIPL section in IPL2 record.
> zIPL load failed.
>
> Trying next boot device...
> LOADPARM=[ ]
> Using virtio-scsi.
> Using guessed DASD geometry.
> Using ECKD scheme (block size 512), CDL
> No zIPL section in IPL2 record.
> zIPL load failed.
>
> So it claims to try to load from the second disk, but it fails.
> If I change the "bootindex=3" of the second disk to "bootindex=1", it
> boots perfectly fine, so I'm sure that the installation on good.qcow2
> is working fine.
>
> Thomas
>
I am able to reproduce this now; I'll investigate the problem.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 15:43 [PATCH 0/5] s390x: Add Full Boot Order Support jrossi
2024-05-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] s390x: Create include files for s390x IPL definitions jrossi
2024-06-03 18:51 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] s390x: Add loadparm to CcwDevice jrossi
2024-06-04 14:27 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 16:27 ` Jared Rossi
2024-06-04 16:59 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 7:49 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390x: Build IPLB chain for multiple boot devices jrossi
2024-06-03 19:03 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 18:26 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 20:01 ` Jared Rossi
2024-06-07 6:11 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] s390x: Add boot device fallback infrastructure jrossi
2024-06-05 8:20 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 12:13 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] s390x: Enable and document boot device fallback on panic jrossi
2024-06-05 13:37 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 14:48 ` Jared Rossi
2024-06-07 5:57 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-16 23:44 ` Jared Rossi
2024-06-20 8:10 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-17 14:49 ` Christian Borntraeger
2024-06-20 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-04 18:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] s390x: Add Full Boot Order Support Thomas Huth
2024-06-05 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-06 19:22 ` Jared Rossi
2024-06-07 6:19 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-10 3:58 ` Jared Rossi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b650a629-6f0b-41fd-93e3-87de48feba94@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).