From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Bruno Piazera Larsen <bruno.larsen@eldorado.org.br>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: farosas@linux.ibm.com, luis.pires@eldorado.org.br,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br, fernando.valle@eldorado.org.br,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] target/ppc: fix address translation bug for hash table mmus
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:19:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b689bdd0-4d75-7c4e-189e-922738208dc0@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39c92ce9-46b8-4847-974c-647c7a5ca2ae@eldorado.org.br>
On 6/2/21 12:58 PM, Bruno Piazera Larsen wrote:
>> For the use from ppc_cpu_get_phys_page_debug, you'd pass in
>> cpu_mmu_index(env, false).
>
> ppc_cpu_get_phys_page_debug has 2 calls to ppc_xlate, one using the data MMU,
> the other using the instruction MMU. I'm guessing I should pass both, right?
Yes.
> But here we have another bit that confuses me: cpu_mmu_index returns 0 if in
> user mode, or uses the information stored in env to get it, so I don't see how
> that would be different from getting directly. Unless the point is to have
> ppc_*_xlate be generic and pc_*_debug knows the info in env is correct. Is that it?
The issue is that
(1) ppc_*_xlate should perform the lookup requested, and mmu_idx
does not *necessarily* correspond to the current contents of
env->msr et al. See (2).
(2) There is a secondary call to ppc_radix64_partition_scoped_xlate
for which the second stage page table should be read
with hypervisor permissions, and not the permissions of the
original memory access.
Note that ppc_radix64_check_prot checks msr_pr directly.
Thus the second stage lookup should use mmu_idx = 5
(HV kernel virtual mode). If I understand things correctly...
>
>>
>>
>>> + const short HV = 1, IR = 2, DR = 3;
>>> + bool MSR[3];
>>> + MSR[HV] = dmmu_idx & 2,
>>> + MSR[IR] = immu_idx & 4,
>>> + MSR[DR] = dmmu_idx & 4;
>>
>> There's no point in the array. Just use three different scalars (real_mode,
>> hv, and pr (note that pr is the major portion of the bug as reported)).
>> Additionally, you'll not be distinguishing immu_idx and dmmu_idx, but using
>> the single idx that's given.
>
> Ah, yeah, that's the "more complex than necessary, but it was easy for me to
> read" part. Scalars are a good solution. In this function in specific, PR
> doesn't actually show up anywhere, so I would actually only need 2. Anyway,
> will start working on this.
Oh, I'll note that your constants above are wrong. I think that you should
have some common routines in (mmu-)internal.h:
/*
* These correspond to the mmu_idx values computed in
* hreg_compute_hflags_value. See the tables therein.
*/
static inline bool mmuidx_pr(int idx) { return idx & 1; }
static inline bool mmuidx_real(int idx) { return idx & 2; }
static inline bool mmuidx_hv(int idx) { return idx & 4; }
because you'll want to use these past mmu-radix64.c.
Then you also have a single place to adjust if the mmu_idx are reordered at a
later date.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 19:18 [RFC PATCH] target/ppc: fix address translation bug for hash table mmus Bruno Larsen (billionai)
2021-06-02 19:26 ` Richard Henderson
2021-06-02 19:58 ` Bruno Piazera Larsen
2021-06-02 22:19 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2021-06-07 19:29 ` Bruno Piazera Larsen
2021-06-07 21:06 ` Richard Henderson
2021-06-08 14:39 ` Bruno Piazera Larsen
2021-06-08 15:35 ` Richard Henderson
2021-06-08 16:37 ` Bruno Piazera Larsen
2021-06-08 18:39 ` Bruno Piazera Larsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b689bdd0-4d75-7c4e-189e-922738208dc0@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=bruno.larsen@eldorado.org.br \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=farosas@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fernando.valle@eldorado.org.br \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br \
--cc=luis.pires@eldorado.org.br \
--cc=matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).