From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9H0p-0006Kj-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:22:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9H0o-0002AI-A7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:22:39 -0400 References: <20180416114414.18406-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20180416114414.18406-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> From: John Snow Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:22:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180416114414.18406-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/7] dirty-bitmap: remove missed bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get_autoload header List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, den@openvz.org On 04/16/2018 07:44 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > --- > include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h > index 1ff8949b1b..c7e910016d 100644 > --- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h > +++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h > @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ int64_t bdrv_get_meta_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); > void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t bytes); > bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_readonly(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); > bool bdrv_has_readonly_bitmaps(BlockDriverState *bs); > -bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get_autoload(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); > bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_get_persistance(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); > bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_qmp_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap); > bool bdrv_has_changed_persistent_bitmaps(BlockDriverState *bs); > Assuming you checked for others as well. Reviewed-by: John Snow