From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAJ03-0006aN-4k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:14:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAIzy-0005To-09 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:14:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]:39010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAIzx-0005TL-Lr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:14:17 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id c25-v6so3033665pfe.6 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:14:17 -0700 (PDT) References: From: Alistair Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:14:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/5] Misc RISC-V patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Alistair Francis , Michael Clark , QEMU Developers On 10/10/2018 11:10 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 October 2018 at 18:49, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> we should really >> get the ball rolling on our big patch backlog. > > Yes, please do. Softfreeze is not all that far away and I > would strongly prefer not to get an enormous sized pull > request at the last minute. The ideal pattern is that > code changes come in at a steady rate across the whole > of the 'open' part of the development cycle. Understandable. I'll send a PR in the next few days. I'm hoping I can bundle it with my PCIe patches which are just waiting on some discussion. Alistair > > thanks > -- PMM >