From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B286C388F9 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1472192A for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="T+68tYoj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EF1472192A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48698 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVtWz-0004qt-UE for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:38:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVtW7-00040z-RK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:37:47 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:41700) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVtW5-0004n2-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:37:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603445864; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qH8RqactvSPHpsjt6azvc1zBXlxbssPGIGkLQRwOYOI=; b=T+68tYoj5JwZDOw9EWanPxQ8lfdzuPvymLxaNRESm5SRlPK9NZd5jiEqgivvNFDtAzXe/m AZFvoLFyG1IXumFLVzp11M872aYMaMoL3BYXgMfQ882Gq7isKengmJHD/+s4EIXXZ0kQIo RYn6GxvMh+u0RyVcv2qoNDlIaMugt20= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-504-mZuDSVGTNZWtj_AFr2eccA-1; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 05:37:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mZuDSVGTNZWtj_AFr2eccA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id v14so232518wmj.6 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:37:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qH8RqactvSPHpsjt6azvc1zBXlxbssPGIGkLQRwOYOI=; b=gheFuxANO8mbQyUvl6Fb/fwcmjcKTAcbHgHmfnVK+XzVuep7WosHhC+Bv6hg6A8m/n wRNfTdwKUOzxaqOeovIc4rr5h6AvFRCdPXTC58UbeDyrdfiOJh+riKEhn/syy+uRuzU8 sCGzJUY2JJFdfImzAPd1eNQykS+7Je2Wk463GDfvBa9oXL4f+lrid1+imjkIpUYrBb9R efwWIBl39O9ItX/fKLNoJhvo3ZN0aAMVGVUVONaXTExsbrEPzSs+OTHpo5SkR/Ji2kWh kMq+g2PBlC81BQo1U9e9Yga/WPlg+mC0qDwdTPXCrmr4xindn/o93FDgqjw9tc/++MmK nY3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320csehUALynHgTdXr082n5bNSkOVgVlsy3/M9fZbiqkdvwU+xW Ctzj3mmIlxaP6apwGghZ/qLvBIVAKrufp4lFetl/YG86MDC/9UwRqqNDY3yjcaXsxnadfvfE/mw I5O6Sq8IPKG1WJek= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2888:: with SMTP id g8mr1377950wmd.130.1603445861493; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:37:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCJF8DDsQg1xFuDsdLgxyGRWeq4UOS8V8sOcieUnhM4WGutka0y7hmjmm7iqd/rgVMBgGaNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2888:: with SMTP id g8mr1377935wmd.130.1603445861270; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:37:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h206sm2141383wmf.47.2020.10.23.02.37.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC] Using gitlab for upstream qemu repo? To: Eric Blake , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Stefan Hajnoczi , Mark Cave-Ayland , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , qemu-devel References: <672b8aa0-2128-23e1-b778-01a4d96b209d@redhat.com> <9f6c63c6-599b-ac15-42e2-b9c1991fc7ee@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:37:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f6c63c6-599b-ac15-42e2-b9c1991fc7ee@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/23 02:46:25 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.107, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 22/10/20 19:24, Eric Blake wrote: > Does this proposal mean that pull requests would have to switch to > gitlab merge requests, or would there be a transition period where > submaintainers still send pull requests via whichever means desired > (mail or gitlab merge request), but the eventual committer repackages > that as a gitlab merge request before it is upstream? No, all it means is that Peter would have to do "git push gitlab" instead of "git push origin" :) and likewise for qemu-web and openbios. I'm open to switching (later) to merge requests for qemu-web, but that's a different story. Paolo