From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47EEC4360C for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4272086A for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8E4272086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41544 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEe13-00027U-MQ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:33:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEdzn-0001Ps-DV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:32:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEdzm-0002es-DE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:32:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEdzi-0002dj-5S; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:32:30 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A62F36955; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maximlenovopc.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.35.206.18]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8844600F8; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: fix I/O test for hosts defaulting to LUKSv2 From: Maxim Levitsky To: "Daniel P." =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Berrang=E9?= , Eric Blake Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 21:32:25 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20190927165153.GO20911@redhat.com> References: <20190927101155.25896-1-berrange@redhat.com> <666c1338-e5c4-3cba-cb89-651755baa065@redhat.com> <20190927165153.GO20911@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 17:51 +0100, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:26:27AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > On 9/27/19 5:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 wrote: > > > Some distros are now defaulting to LUKS version 2 which QEMU cannot > > > process. For our I/O test that validates interoperability between t= he > > > kernel/cryptsetup and QEMU, we need to explicitly ask for version 1 > > > of the LUKS format. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Ultimately, it would be nice to get LUKS 2 support in qemu too, but t= hat's a > > much bigger job. This is fine for now. If there is need, I volunteer to research the area and if this is feasibl= e, add support for LUKSv2. I haven't yet had looked at the spec. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky