From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] s390x/css: Introduce an ESW struct
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 11:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b89e80d0-5b2b-6ef0-b94d-cd69ad0192b0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617232537.1337506-2-farman@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Eric,
On 6/18/21 1:25 AM, Eric Farman wrote:
> The Interrupt Response Block is comprised of several other
> structures concatenated together, but only the 12-byte
> Subchannel-Status Word (SCSW) is defined as a proper struct.
> Everything else is a simple array of 32-bit words.
>
> Let's define a proper struct for the 20-byte Extended-Status
> Word (ESW) so that we can make good decisions about the sense
> data that would go into the ECW area for virtual vs
> passthrough devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/css.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> include/hw/s390x/ioinst.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/css.c b/hw/s390x/css.c
> index bed46f5ec3..59d935570e 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/css.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c
> @@ -1335,6 +1335,14 @@ static void copy_schib_to_guest(SCHIB *dest, const SCHIB *src)
> }
> }
>
> +static void copy_esw_to_guest(ESW *dest, const ESW *src)
> +{
> + dest->word0 = cpu_to_be32(src->word0);
> + dest->erw = cpu_to_be32(src->erw);
> + dest->f_addr = cpu_to_be64(src->f_addr);
FYI you fixed an endianess bug, thanks.
Conny told me it was not a problem because f_addr was not used.
> + dest->s_addr = cpu_to_be32(src->s_addr);
> +}
> +
> IOInstEnding css_do_stsch(SubchDev *sch, SCHIB *schib)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -1604,9 +1612,8 @@ static void copy_irb_to_guest(IRB *dest, const IRB *src, const PMCW *pmcw,
>
> copy_scsw_to_guest(&dest->scsw, &src->scsw);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dest->esw); i++) {
> - dest->esw[i] = cpu_to_be32(src->esw[i]);
> - }
> + copy_esw_to_guest(&dest->esw, &src->esw);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dest->ecw); i++) {
> dest->ecw[i] = cpu_to_be32(src->ecw[i]);
> }
> @@ -1655,9 +1662,9 @@ int css_do_tsch_get_irb(SubchDev *sch, IRB *target_irb, int *irb_len)
> SCSW_CSTAT_CHN_CTRL_CHK |
> SCSW_CSTAT_INTF_CTRL_CHK)) {
> irb.scsw.flags |= SCSW_FLAGS_MASK_ESWF;
> - irb.esw[0] = 0x04804000;
> + irb.esw.word0 = 0x04804000;
> } else {
> - irb.esw[0] = 0x00800000;
> + irb.esw.word0 = 0x00800000;
> }
> /* If a unit check is pending, copy sense data. */
> if ((schib->scsw.dstat & SCSW_DSTAT_UNIT_CHECK) &&
> @@ -1670,7 +1677,7 @@ int css_do_tsch_get_irb(SubchDev *sch, IRB *target_irb, int *irb_len)
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(irb.ecw); i++) {
> irb.ecw[i] = be32_to_cpu(irb.ecw[i]);
> }
> - irb.esw[1] = 0x01000000 | (sizeof(sch->sense_data) << 8);
> + irb.esw.erw = ESW_ERW_SENSE | (sizeof(sch->sense_data) << 8);
> }
> }
> /* Store the irb to the guest. */
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/ioinst.h b/include/hw/s390x/ioinst.h
> index c6737a30d4..e7ab401781 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/ioinst.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/ioinst.h
> @@ -123,10 +123,20 @@ typedef struct SCHIB {
> uint8_t mda[4];
> } QEMU_PACKED SCHIB;
>
> +/* format-0 extended-status word */
> +typedef struct ESW {
> + uint32_t word0;
> + uint32_t erw;
> + uint64_t f_addr; /* Zeros for other ESW formats */
> + uint32_t s_addr; /* Zeros for other ESW formats */
> +} QEMU_PACKED ESW;
> +
> +#define ESW_ERW_SENSE 0x01000000
> +
> /* interruption response block */
> typedef struct IRB {
> SCSW scsw;
> - uint32_t esw[5];
> + ESW esw;
> uint32_t ecw[8];
> uint32_t emw[8];
> } IRB;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 23:25 [PATCH v4 0/4] s390x: Fix IRB sense data Eric Farman
2021-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] s390x/css: Introduce an ESW struct Eric Farman
2021-06-18 9:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-06-18 12:57 ` Eric Farman
2021-06-18 11:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-06-18 12:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-06-18 12:55 ` Eric Farman
2021-06-18 13:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-06 9:39 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] s390x/css: Split out the IRB sense data Eric Farman
2021-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] s390x/css: Refactor IRB construction Eric Farman
2021-06-17 23:25 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] s390x/css: Add passthrough IRB Eric Farman
2021-06-18 9:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] s390x: Fix IRB sense data Cornelia Huck
2021-06-18 15:27 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b89e80d0-5b2b-6ef0-b94d-cd69ad0192b0@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).