From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9Xm-00033t-JQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:20:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9Xg-0004Kc-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:20:25 -0400 Received: from mail.uni-paderborn.de ([131.234.142.9]:40876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9Xg-0004Je-7c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:20:20 -0400 References: <1474401271-3104-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <20160922084020.12fb895a@thh440s> <22edb41a-1917-1445-8c9c-3889c1a21048@twiddle.net> From: Bastian Koppelmann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:20:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <22edb41a-1917-1445-8c9c-3889c1a21048@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/13] AVR target List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson , Thomas Huth Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/22/2016 06:10 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/21/2016 11:40 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> Slowly we're getting really a lot of target-something folders in the >> main directory. Maybe we should rather introduce a singly "target" >> folder instead and put all the targets under that folder? So we then >> get target/avr/, target/ppc/, target/i386/ etc. in the tree instead. >> Would look much more tidied up to me. Our main folder is IMHO still >> too much overcrowded. > > I don't feel the same overcrowding, but I wouldn't be opposed if others > agree and if you want to do all the adjusting of the build system. > > > r~ > I agree with Thomas here. There is at least RISC-V, which is about to hit upstream. Cheers, Bastian