From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Haibin Zhang <haibinzhang@tencent.com>,
David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
dgilbert@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: add romsize property
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:51:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9b7e55a-0f90-6680-8e15-992997afdd38@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201218182736.1634344-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
+pflash
On 12/18/20 7:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This property can be useful for distros to set up known-good ROM sizes for
> migration purposes. The VM will fail to start if the ROM is too large,
> and migration compatibility will not be broken if the ROM is too small.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/pci/pci.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> hw/xen/xen_pt_load_rom.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> index d4349ea577..fd25253c2a 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void pcibus_reset(BusState *qbus);
> static Property pci_props[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_PCI_DEVFN("addr", PCIDevice, devfn, -1),
> DEFINE_PROP_STRING("romfile", PCIDevice, romfile),
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("romsize", PCIDevice, romsize, -1),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("rombar", PCIDevice, rom_bar, 1),
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT("multifunction", PCIDevice, cap_present,
> QEMU_PCI_CAP_MULTIFUNCTION_BITNR, false),
> @@ -2106,6 +2107,11 @@ static void pci_qdev_realize(DeviceState *qdev, Error **errp)
> bool is_default_rom;
> uint16_t class_id;
>
> + if (pci_dev->romsize != -1 && !is_power_of_2(pci_dev->romsize)) {
> + error_setg(errp, "ROM size %d is not a power of two", pci_dev->romsize);
> + return;
> + }
Some cloud providers already complained the pow2 check in the pflash
device (wasting host storage). Personally I find using pow2 easier
and safer.
The pow2 check looks like a separate change however, maybe add in a
separate patch? Or maybe not :)
Regards,
Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-18 18:27 [PATCH] pci: add romsize property Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-18 18:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-01-19 16:31 ` Peter Xu
2021-01-19 16:51 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-01-19 17:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-19 17:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-19 17:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2021-01-22 14:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-20 10:14 ` David Edmondson
2021-01-22 14:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9b7e55a-0f90-6680-8e15-992997afdd38@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=haibinzhang@tencent.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).