From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: add backend for mssim
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:06:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbe14f32fcf19ba4c800953c7db6486a340d5b14.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5dNC77CubqrfXku@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 15:47 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Copy'ing Markus for QAPI design feedback.
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 12:10:18PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
[...]
> > +##
> > +# @TPMmssimOptions:
> > +#
> > +# Information for the mssim emulator connection
> > +#
> > +# @host: host name or IP address to connect to
> > +# @port: port for the standard TPM commands
> > +# @ctrl: control port for TPM state changes
> > +#
> > +# Since: 7.2.0
> > +##
> > +{ 'struct': 'TPMmssimOptions',
> > + 'data': {
> > + 'host': 'str',
> > + 'port': 'str',
> > + 'ctrl': 'str' },
> > + 'if': 'CONFIG_TPM' }
>
> We don't want to be adding new code using plain host/port combos,
> as that misses extra functionality for controlling IPv4 vs IPv6
> usage.
>
> The existing 'emulator' backend references a chardev, but I'm
> not especially in favour of using the chardev indirection either,
> when all we should really need is a SocketAddress
>
> IOW, from a QAPI design POV, IMHO the best practice would be
>
> { 'struct': 'TPMmssimOptions',
> 'data': {
> 'command': 'SocketAddress',
> 'control': 'SocketAddress' },
> 'if': 'CONFIG_TPM' }
>
>
> The main wrinkle with this is that exprssing nested struct fields
> with QemuOpts is a disaster zone, and -tpmdev doesn't yet support
> JSON syntax.
>
> IMHO we should just fix the latter problem, as I don't think it
> ought to be too hard. Probably a cut+paste / search/replace job
> on the chanmge we did for -device in:
>
> commit 5dacda5167560b3af8eadbce5814f60ba44b467e
> Author: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Oct 8 15:34:42 2021 +0200
>
> vl: Enable JSON syntax for -device
>
> This would mean we could use plain -tpmdev for a local instance
>
> -tpmdev mssim,id=tpm0 \
> -device tpm-crb,tpmdev=tpm0 \
>
> but to use a remote emulator we would use
>
> -tpmdev "{'backend': 'mssim', 'id': 'tpm0',
> 'command': {
> 'type': 'inet',
> 'host': 'remote',
> 'port': '4455'
> },
> 'control': {
> 'type': 'inet',
> 'host': 'remote',
> 'port': '4456'
> }}"
>
> (without the whitepace/newlines, which i just used for sake of
> clarity)
Just on this, might it not be easier for the commandline to do what
gluster does? just use the '.' as a separator and subqdict extraction,
so you'd specify
-tpmdev mssim,id=tpm0,command.type=inet,command.host=remote,command.port=4455,control.type=inet,control.host=remote,control.port=4456
With the added bonus that X.type could be defaulted to inet and
control.host could follow command.host and so on?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-12 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-10 17:10 [PATCH] tpm: add backend for mssim James Bottomley
2022-12-12 13:43 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 13:59 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 14:27 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 14:32 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 14:44 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 14:47 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 15:20 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 15:28 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 15:46 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 15:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-12 16:38 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 16:59 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 18:48 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 18:58 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 19:12 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 19:32 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 20:24 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 21:36 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 22:02 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-12 22:27 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-12 22:43 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-14 11:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-14 12:43 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-15 2:42 ` Stefan Berger
2022-12-14 11:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-12 22:06 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2022-12-14 11:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-14 12:47 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-14 14:17 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbe14f32fcf19ba4c800953c7db6486a340d5b14.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).