Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] s390x: protvirt: Add pv state to cpu env

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 29.11.19 10:48, Janosch Frank wrote:
> We need to know if we run in pv state or not when emulating
> instructions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 2 ++
>  target/s390x/cpu.h         | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index e2a302398d..6fcd695b81 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>                  s390_pv_vcpu_destroy(t);
>              }
>              s390_pv_vm_destroy();
> +            env->pv = false;
>          }
>  
>          qemu_devices_reset();
> @@ -406,6 +407,7 @@ static void s390_machine_reset(MachineState *machine)
>          s390_ipl_pv_unpack();
>          /* Verify integrity */
>          s390_pv_verify();
> +        env->pv = true;
>          s390_cpu_set_state(S390_CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu);
>          break;
>      default:
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index d2af13b345..43e6c286d2 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct CPUS390XState {
>  
>      /* Fields up to this point are cleared by a CPU reset */
>      struct {} end_reset_fields;
> +    bool pv; /* protected virtualization */

so ... the preceding patches fail to compile?

Please properly squash that ...

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb