From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebojr-0004gC-VB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:30:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebojn-0004hy-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:30:51 -0500 References: <20180117141849.65757-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20180117141849.65757-3-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:30:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180117141849.65757-3-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] s390x/kvm: Handle bpb feature List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christian Borntraeger , Cornelia Huck Cc: qemu-devel , qemu-s390x , Alexander Graf , Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson , Janosch Frank , Halil Pasic On 17.01.2018 15:18, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We need to handle the bpb control on reset and migration. Normally > stfle.82 is transparent (and the normal guest part works without > hypervisor activity). To prevent any issues we require full > host kernel support for this feature. Actually it is not transparent because we need hypervisor support to get VSIE running... or what am I missing? (or were you talking about bit 81?) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb