From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Babu Moger" <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Ewan Hai" <ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com>, "Pu Wen" <puwen@hygon.cn>,
"Tao Su" <tao1.su@intel.com>, "Yi Lai" <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] i386/cpu: Fix CPUID[0x80000006] for Intel CPU
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 15:09:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd979e2d-e036-4a1a-bf8a-0098eadb4821@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620092734.1576677-9-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
On 6/20/2025 5:27 PM, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Per SDM, Intel supports CPUID[0x80000006]. But only L2 information is
> encoded in ECX (note that L2 associativity field encodings rules
> consistent with AMD are used), all other fields are reserved.
>
> Therefore, make the following changes to CPUID[0x80000006]:
> * Rename AMD_ENC_ASSOC to X86_ENC_ASSOC since Intel also uses the same
> rules. (While there are some slight differences between the rules in
> AMD APM v4.07 no.40332 and those in the current QEMU, generally they
> are consistent.)
> * Check the vendor in CPUID[0x80000006] and just encode L2 to ECX for
> Intel.
> * Assert L2's lines_per_tag is not 0 for AMD, and assert it is 0 for
> Intel.
> * Apply the encoding change of Intel for Zhaoxin as well [1].
>
> This fix also resolves the FIXME of legacy_l2_cache_amd:
>
> /*FIXME: CPUID leaf 0x80000006 is inconsistent with leaves 2 & 4 */
>
> In addition, per AMD's APM, update the comment of CPUID[0x80000006].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/c522ebb5-04d5-49c6-9ad8-d755b8998988@zhaoxin.com/
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> * Check vendor_cpuid_only_v2 instead of vendor_cpuid_only.
> * Move lines_per_tag assert check into encode_cache_cpuid80000006().
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index df40d1362566..0b292aa2e07b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -506,8 +506,8 @@ static uint32_t encode_cache_cpuid80000005(CPUCacheInfo *cache)
>
> #define ASSOC_FULL 0xFF
>
> -/* AMD associativity encoding used on CPUID Leaf 0x80000006: */
> -#define AMD_ENC_ASSOC(a) (a <= 1 ? a : \
> +/* x86 associativity encoding used on CPUID Leaf 0x80000006: */
> +#define X86_ENC_ASSOC(a) (a <= 1 ? a : \
> a == 2 ? 0x2 : \
> a == 4 ? 0x4 : \
> a == 8 ? 0x6 : \
> @@ -526,23 +526,26 @@ static uint32_t encode_cache_cpuid80000005(CPUCacheInfo *cache)
> */
> static void encode_cache_cpuid80000006(CPUCacheInfo *l2,
> CPUCacheInfo *l3,
> - uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx)
> + uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx,
> + bool lines_per_tag_supported)
> {
> assert(l2->size % 1024 == 0);
> assert(l2->associativity > 0);
> - assert(l2->lines_per_tag > 0);
> - assert(l2->line_size > 0);
why remove the assert for l2->line_size?
> + assert(lines_per_tag_supported ?
> + l2->lines_per_tag > 0 : l2->lines_per_tag == 0);
> *ecx = ((l2->size / 1024) << 16) |
> - (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(l2->associativity) << 12) |
> + (X86_ENC_ASSOC(l2->associativity) << 12) |
> (l2->lines_per_tag << 8) | (l2->line_size);
>
> + /* For Intel, EDX is reserved. */
> if (l3) {
> assert(l3->size % (512 * 1024) == 0);
> assert(l3->associativity > 0);
> - assert(l3->lines_per_tag > 0);
> + assert(lines_per_tag_supported ?
> + l3->lines_per_tag > 0 : l3->lines_per_tag == 0);
> assert(l3->line_size > 0);
> *edx = ((l3->size / (512 * 1024)) << 18) |
> - (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(l3->associativity) << 12) |
> + (X86_ENC_ASSOC(l3->associativity) << 12) |
> (l3->lines_per_tag << 8) | (l3->line_size);
> } else {
> *edx = 0;
> @@ -711,7 +714,6 @@ static CPUCacheInfo legacy_l2_cache = {
> .share_level = CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_CORE,
> };
>
> -/*FIXME: CPUID leaf 0x80000006 is inconsistent with leaves 2 & 4 */
> static CPUCacheInfo legacy_l2_cache_amd = {
> .type = UNIFIED_CACHE,
> .level = 2,
> @@ -7906,23 +7908,33 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> *edx = encode_cache_cpuid80000005(env->cache_info_amd.l1i_cache);
> break;
> case 0x80000006:
> - /* cache info (L2 cache) */
> + /* cache info (L2 cache/TLB/L3 cache) */
> if (cpu->cache_info_passthrough) {
> x86_cpu_get_cache_cpuid(index, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> break;
> }
> - *eax = (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(L2_DTLB_2M_ASSOC) << 28) |
> +
> + if (cpu->vendor_cpuid_only_v2 &&
> + (IS_INTEL_CPU(env) || IS_ZHAOXIN_CPU(env))) {
> + *eax = *ebx = 0;
> + encode_cache_cpuid80000006(env->cache_info_cpuid4.l2_cache,
> + NULL, ecx, edx, false);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + *eax = (X86_ENC_ASSOC(L2_DTLB_2M_ASSOC) << 28) |
> (L2_DTLB_2M_ENTRIES << 16) |
> - (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(L2_ITLB_2M_ASSOC) << 12) |
> + (X86_ENC_ASSOC(L2_ITLB_2M_ASSOC) << 12) |
> (L2_ITLB_2M_ENTRIES);
> - *ebx = (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(L2_DTLB_4K_ASSOC) << 28) |
> + *ebx = (X86_ENC_ASSOC(L2_DTLB_4K_ASSOC) << 28) |
> (L2_DTLB_4K_ENTRIES << 16) |
> - (AMD_ENC_ASSOC(L2_ITLB_4K_ASSOC) << 12) |
> + (X86_ENC_ASSOC(L2_ITLB_4K_ASSOC) << 12) |
> (L2_ITLB_4K_ENTRIES);
> +
> encode_cache_cpuid80000006(env->cache_info_amd.l2_cache,
> cpu->enable_l3_cache ?
> env->cache_info_amd.l3_cache : NULL,
> - ecx, edx);
> + ecx, edx, true);
> break;
> case 0x80000007:
> *eax = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 9:27 [PATCH 00/16] i386/cpu: Unify the cache model in X86CPUState Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 01/16] i386/cpu: Refine comment of CPUID2CacheDescriptorInfo Zhao Liu
2025-07-02 8:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-07-03 7:38 ` Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 02/16] i386/cpu: Add descriptor 0x49 for CPUID 0x2 encoding Zhao Liu
2025-07-02 9:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-07-03 7:39 ` Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 03/16] i386/cpu: Add default cache model for Intel CPUs with level < 4 Zhao Liu
2025-07-02 9:53 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-07-03 7:47 ` Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 04/16] i386/cpu: Present same cache model in CPUID 0x2 & 0x4 Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 4:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-07-03 6:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 05/16] i386/cpu: Consolidate CPUID 0x4 leaf Zhao Liu
2025-06-26 12:10 ` Ewan Hai
2025-06-27 2:44 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 6:41 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 06/16] i386/cpu: Drop CPUID 0x2 specific cache info in X86CPUState Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 7:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 07/16] i386/cpu: Mark CPUID[0x80000005] as reserved for Intel Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 7:07 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 08/16] i386/cpu: Fix CPUID[0x80000006] for Intel CPU Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 7:09 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2025-07-03 7:52 ` Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 09/16] i386/cpu: Add legacy_intel_cache_info cache model Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 7:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 10/16] i386/cpu: Add legacy_amd_cache_info " Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 7:18 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 11/16] i386/cpu: Select legacy cache model based on vendor in CPUID 0x2 Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 8:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 12/16] i386/cpu: Select legacy cache model based on vendor in CPUID 0x4 Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 8:49 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 13/16] i386/cpu: Select legacy cache model based on vendor in CPUID 0x80000005 Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 8:52 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 14/16] i386/cpu: Select legacy cache model based on vendor in CPUID 0x80000006 Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 15/16] i386/cpu: Select legacy cache model based on vendor in CPUID 0x8000001D Zhao Liu
2025-06-20 9:27 ` [PATCH 16/16] i386/cpu: Use a unified cache_info in X86CPUState Zhao Liu
2025-07-03 8:53 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-07-03 9:50 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd979e2d-e036-4a1a-bf8a-0098eadb4821@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=tao1.su@intel.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).