From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa3p2-00035j-Cq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:27:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa3oy-0001MX-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:27:04 -0400 Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([89.248.209.98]:60066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xa3ox-0001MR-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:26:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:26:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre DERUMIER Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <542EA76B.8000102@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] is x-data-plane considered "stable" ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Scott Sullivan Hi Paolo, do you you think it'll be possible to use block jobs with dataplane ? Or is it technically impossible ? ----- Mail original ----- De: "Paolo Bonzini" =C3=80: "Alexandre DERUMIER" , "Scott Sullivan" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Envoy=C3=A9: Vendredi 3 Octobre 2014 15:40:59 Objet: Re: is x-data-plane considered "stable" ? Il 03/10/2014 12:11, Alexandre DERUMIER ha scritto: > I don't now about the stability, but here what is working and I have test= ed: > > -live migration > -resizing > -io throttling > -hotplugging > > I think block jobs (mirror,backup,...) don't work yet. > > > it's working with virtio-blk and virtio-scsi support is coming for qemu 2= .2 virtio-scsi support will _not_ be stable in 2.2. It will only be there for developers, basically. Paolo