From: "Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@indt.org.br>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm: wrong execution of post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are the same register
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:32:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdb0025f0703151332j36d31aa7i6ee2cea9bfb29a94@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703152003.21276.paul@codesourcery.com>
Hi Paul,
On 3/15/07, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 March 2007 19:35, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
> > Qemu-arm is wrongly executing post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are
> > the same register. For example:
> >
> > ldr r0, [r1], +r0
> >
> > Current behavior:
> > r0 <- [r1]
> > r1 <- r1 + r0
> >
> > Expected behavior:
> > addr <- r1
> > r1 <- r1 + r0
> > r0 <- [addr]
>
> This is still wrong.
So, is this a known bug?
> The writeback must happen after the load.
We code like this because
- we didn't find this restriction in arm reference manual
- the LLVM uses this instruction expecting a result like this
- That was the result that we got running these instructions in an OMAP1710
> Your
> implementation will give incorrect results if the load faults.
Another thing, is that in this manual (at page A2-18) there are 2
rules for data abort:
- Base Restored Abort Model and Base Updated Abort Model.
So, we can not understand why it will give incorect results if a load faults...
>
> Paul
thanks
Rodrigo Vivi
vivijim at freenode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-15 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-15 19:35 [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm: wrong execution of post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are the same register Lauro Ramos Venancio
2007-03-15 19:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Lauro Ramos Venancio
2007-03-15 20:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
2007-03-15 20:32 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2007-03-15 21:10 ` Paul Brook
2007-03-15 21:19 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2007-03-15 21:55 ` Laurent Desnogues
2007-03-15 22:04 ` Paul Brook
2007-03-16 20:42 ` Lauro Ramos Venancio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bdb0025f0703151332j36d31aa7i6ee2cea9bfb29a94@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com \
--cc=lauro.venancio@indt.org.br \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).