Re: [PATCH] hw/nvme: fix endianness issue for shadow doorbells

["Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>]

On 7/18/23 12:35, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> 
> In commit 2fda0726e514 ("hw/nvme: fix missing endian conversions for
> doorbell buffers"), we fixed shadow doorbells for big-endian guests
> running on little endian hosts. But I did not fix little-endian guests
> on big-endian hosts. Fix this.
> 
> Solves issue #1765.

Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1765

> Fixes: 3f7fe8de3d49 ("hw/nvme: Implement shadow doorbell buffer support")
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>

Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>

with a PowerNV QEMU machine running on a s390x LPAR.

Thanks,

C.


> ---
>   hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
> index 8e8e870b9a80..dadc2dc7da10 100644
> --- a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
> +++ b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
> @@ -6801,6 +6801,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_dbbuf_config(NvmeCtrl *n, const NvmeRequest *req)
>       PCIDevice *pci = PCI_DEVICE(n);
>       uint64_t dbs_addr = le64_to_cpu(req->cmd.dptr.prp1);
>       uint64_t eis_addr = le64_to_cpu(req->cmd.dptr.prp2);
> +    uint32_t v;
>       int i;
>   
>       /* Address should be page aligned */
> @@ -6818,6 +6819,8 @@ static uint16_t nvme_dbbuf_config(NvmeCtrl *n, const NvmeRequest *req)
>           NvmeCQueue *cq = n->cq[i];
>   
>           if (sq) {
> +            v = cpu_to_le32(sq->tail);
> +
>               /*
>                * CAP.DSTRD is 0, so offset of ith sq db_addr is (i<<3)
>                * nvme_process_db() uses this hard-coded way to calculate
> @@ -6825,7 +6828,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_dbbuf_config(NvmeCtrl *n, const NvmeRequest *req)
>                */
>               sq->db_addr = dbs_addr + (i << 3);
>               sq->ei_addr = eis_addr + (i << 3);
> -            pci_dma_write(pci, sq->db_addr, &sq->tail, sizeof(sq->tail));
> +            pci_dma_write(pci, sq->db_addr, &v, sizeof(sq->tail));
>   
>               if (n->params.ioeventfd && sq->sqid != 0) {
>                   if (!nvme_init_sq_ioeventfd(sq)) {
> @@ -6835,10 +6838,12 @@ static uint16_t nvme_dbbuf_config(NvmeCtrl *n, const NvmeRequest *req)
>           }
>   
>           if (cq) {
> +            v = cpu_to_le32(cq->head);
> +
>               /* CAP.DSTRD is 0, so offset of ith cq db_addr is (i<<3)+(1<<2) */
>               cq->db_addr = dbs_addr + (i << 3) + (1 << 2);
>               cq->ei_addr = eis_addr + (i << 3) + (1 << 2);
> -            pci_dma_write(pci, cq->db_addr, &cq->head, sizeof(cq->head));
> +            pci_dma_write(pci, cq->db_addr, &v, sizeof(cq->head));
>   
>               if (n->params.ioeventfd && cq->cqid != 0) {
>                   if (!nvme_init_cq_ioeventfd(cq)) {
> @@ -7587,7 +7592,7 @@ static uint64_t nvme_mmio_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>   static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int val)
>   {
>       PCIDevice *pci = PCI_DEVICE(n);
> -    uint32_t qid;
> +    uint32_t qid, v;
>   
>       if (unlikely(addr & ((1 << 2) - 1))) {
>           NVME_GUEST_ERR(pci_nvme_ub_db_wr_misaligned,
> @@ -7654,7 +7659,8 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int val)
>           start_sqs = nvme_cq_full(cq) ? 1 : 0;
>           cq->head = new_head;
>           if (!qid && n->dbbuf_enabled) {
> -            pci_dma_write(pci, cq->db_addr, &cq->head, sizeof(cq->head));
> +            v = cpu_to_le32(cq->head);
> +            pci_dma_write(pci, cq->db_addr, &v, sizeof(cq->head));
>           }
>           if (start_sqs) {
>               NvmeSQueue *sq;
> @@ -7714,6 +7720,8 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int val)
>   
>           sq->tail = new_tail;
>           if (!qid && n->dbbuf_enabled) {
> +            v = cpu_to_le32(sq->tail);
> +
>               /*
>                * The spec states "the host shall also update the controller's
>                * corresponding doorbell property to match the value of that entry
> @@ -7727,7 +7735,7 @@ static void nvme_process_db(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, int val)
>                * including ones that run on Linux, are not updating Admin Queues,
>                * so we can't trust reading it for an appropriate sq tail.
>                */
> -            pci_dma_write(pci, sq->db_addr, &sq->tail, sizeof(sq->tail));
> +            pci_dma_write(pci, sq->db_addr, &v, sizeof(sq->tail));
>           }
>   
>           qemu_bh_schedule(sq->bh);