Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] vTPM for aarch64

[Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>]

On 2/26/20 1:18 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 2/26/20 6:53 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 2/26/20 12:47 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> On 2/26/20 2:32 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/20 5:25 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>>> This series adds the capability to instantiate an MMIO TPM TIS
>>>>> in ARM virt. It is candidate to qemu 5.0.
>>>> Looks good. Can you run the checkpatch script over the patches and
>>>> address the warnings?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thank you for you review!
>>>
>>> About warnings
>>>
>>> - There are warnings due to new files added but I think they all have an
>>> entry in MAINTAINERS as wildcards are used.
>>>
>>> - In tpm: Add the SysBus TPM TIS device.
>>>     There is line over 80 chars but I think it is fine
>>>
>>> #define TPM_TIS_SYSBUS(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(TPMStateSysBus, (obj),
>>> TYPE_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS)
>>
>> Ok, leave it as it is.
> and sorry, what about the comment style issues derived from existing files?
>
> "
> - test: tpm-tis: Get prepared to share tests between ISA and sysbus devices
> has lots of warnings due to old comment style being used in
> tests/qtest/tpm-tis-test.c. I did not fix the style issue because I just
> copy the code into tpm-tis-util.c
>
> Do you want me to fix them in the same patch, in a separate patch or
> ignore the style issue for now?


if you could fix them that would be great...


> "
>
> Thanks
>
> Eric
>
>
>>
>>     Stefan
>>
>>