From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtIth-0005x1-8k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:13:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtItg-0002VJ-Lx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:13:49 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:35320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gtItg-0002Um-AS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:13:48 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1BL2bVn119928 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:13:45 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qkenr5bsn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:13:45 -0500 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:13:44 -0000 References: <1549897385-10091-1-git-send-email-liam.merwick@oracle.com> <1549897385-10091-3-git-send-email-liam.merwick@oracle.com> <13b4d86c-0af3-12b9-fce5-92f1eb0fe95d@redhat.com> <0251e2fc-3dbd-937a-0649-71fcd64e2d14@linux.ibm.com> <0b53df4a-7065-b3b7-c419-3f8e55cffdfd@oracle.com> From: Stefan Berger Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:13:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0b53df4a-7065-b3b7-c419-3f8e55cffdfd@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-MW Message-Id: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm_tis: fix format string specifier in tpm_tis_show_buffer() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Liam Merwick , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2/11/19 3:09 PM, Liam Merwick wrote: > > > I'd come up the attached change (but that seems like overkill). I don't think we need tracing for this.