From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IyGdx-0004i6-G2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:55:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IyGdv-0004ga-QH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:55:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyGdv-0004gP-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:55:39 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IyGdv-0008M6-DF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:55:39 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so3299538waf for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:55:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:55:37 -0800 From: "Valery Surkov" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] Host ARM Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, What is current situation with Host ARM and guest X86? We are planning to use such combination on PXA320 based system (forced to use Wine). What do you think guys, is it wise, to spend time and money trying to do it? Best Wishes, Val.