From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Cc: david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, hsp.cat7@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] cuda: decrease time delay before raising VIA SR interrupt
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 19:21:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bff82e7a-2315-fd42-cdae-e7d0baa2fd08@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8329ece-32a2-d591-2ffc-3cdb468d56aa@ilande.co.uk>
On 2/12/19 6:50 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 12/02/2019 17:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
>>>> If this delay is to prevent a bug which only happens in MacOS then that's the hack
>>>> not the normal code path to run without the delay that you've just removed. So maybe
>>>> this should be kept if possible to avoid unecessary delays for other guests.
>>>> (Although if this only affects mac99,via=cuda but not mac99,via=pmu then I don't care
>>>> much as long as pmu works.)
>>>
>>> Well the reality is that the detection above doesn't actually seem to work anyway -
>>> at least a quick boot test with Linux, MacOS X and MacOS 9 with a printf() added into
>>> the if() shows nothing firing once the kernel takes over. So the slow path with the
>>> delay included was always being taken within the OS anyway.
>>>
>>> And indeed, the code doesn't affect pmu so you won't see any difference there.
>>>
>>>>> As a plus it also prevents a guest OS from accidentally triggering the hack whilst
>>>>> programming the VIA port.
>>>>
>>>> That may be a problem though. What's the issue exactly? Why is the delay needed in
>>>> the first place?
>>>
>>> It's some kind of racy polling with OS 9 (I wasn't involved in the technical details,
>>> sorry) which causes OS 9 to hang on boot if the delay isn't present. And even better
>>> the slow path that was previously always being taken has now been reduced from 300us
>>> to 30us so whichever way you look at it, having this patch applied is a win.
>>
>> Can you write a paragraph about this, that David can amend to your
>> patch? That would stop worrying me about looking at this patch in
>> various months...
>
> Hmmmm well the existing description already describes the interrupt race in OS 9 so I
> guess the only part missing is the bit about the fast path. How about the revised
> text below for the patch description?
>
>
> cuda: decrease time delay before raising VIA SR interrupt and remove fast path
>
> In order to handle a race condition in the MacOS 9 CUDA driver, a delay was
> introduced when raising the VIA SR interrupt inspired by similar code in
> MacOnLinux.
>
> During original testing of the MacOS 9 patches it was found that the 30us
> delay used in MacOnLinux did not work reliably within QEMU, and a value of
> 300us was required to function correctly.
>
> Recent experiments have shown two things: firstly when booting Linux, MacOS
> 9 and MacOS X the fast path which bypasses the delay is never triggered once the
> OS kernel is loaded making it effectively useless. Rather than leave this code
> in place where a guest could potentially enable it by accident and break itself,
> we might as well just remove it.
>
> Secondly the previous reliability issues are no longer present, and this value
> can be reduced down to 20us with no apparent ill effects. This has the benefit of
> considerably improving the responsiveness of the ADB keyboard and mouse within
> the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
>
Thanks!
Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-10 17:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cuda: decrease time delay before raising VIA SR interrupt Mark Cave-Ayland
2019-02-10 23:16 ` David Gibson
2019-02-11 23:35 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-02-12 6:59 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2019-02-12 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " BALATON Zoltan
2019-02-12 16:51 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2019-02-12 17:21 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-02-12 17:50 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2019-02-12 18:21 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2019-02-12 20:01 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2019-02-13 0:21 ` David Gibson
2019-02-13 7:08 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bff82e7a-2315-fd42-cdae-e7d0baa2fd08@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=hsp.cat7@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).