From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF4F6C54EAA for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLTsl-0001OA-Kz; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:55:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLTsj-0001Nl-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:55:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLTsh-0006Tv-T5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:55:25 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id i65so3958936pfc.0 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=toGjTUhmp9m8OTHR8tBDzkcIZ2BpClSqRB+9Fsb4Eas=; b=VQQitSK2p4mCktdHCW8fBdpLCd4tm2T+MSMX2ngZ+91jqVlLDfWGstP10g2S3V4fwu nbpkrQoKIqlnfDwEKC7hNRR2sMbrcx1PeTf6TLqPmGpbiscwipf0/H4Iygd8FTPapkun hkN8HmK5a7Z8XUsrGOPGUU0sHI8HTlTgvmdx19w4iVnnu5GYZ41Qelmx4dqJx1uBIJvY iOHSQxPhtKFTJjY5jnvgdJmGty3Lv3WAgbRkZNfDxRiLanAf6rkqDHNUJJmR2nJhslPx puWpkpJ4U7Wz8nWnHjfHdvOIzYFSLXjZlfUBIhSmnwj6TJty+OLoDvT5808bky6pEZOs g9rg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=toGjTUhmp9m8OTHR8tBDzkcIZ2BpClSqRB+9Fsb4Eas=; b=UqDxiLj4asFxkU4JjoEAGZuhctWLXgOYBrQHo8kIv4IlAOpnJ10oxeX9wjM+WKFK2e IFKupQ0lw+uHkd2lnL75bG2ZJMT8xTlDDqAdgCVa8qvHJwnKKAVTUJMWuo3CJwkb7WEP 8SGQWUuISYAeMgyZ7SX/EsJz5n+XKHK5ipDg523xSJr5hhuK0Y2b99PXSboAYrEMdP21 KPjs+GaRg1FUhsS9Uv4vTRoJDRmmxcUtPRkiS8DqqZcY3quV42VSplKE6uWLaMDtiPxF 3p0r0UtzfNDap5UiCpyMIaTUWe/nT69GkACTvV1nRkGaYfE+m1PTfXBOgKQcEZS3sgFe DeFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqkBlFbx5aBac7/4/XHP3KUuwGGrtNhbeFNBe5brrsembUX2+DP vHlRnObZ0omCaQqySHagLBdnqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtrIf1ZDGrzyQgtJCzA0GycMf04ReWdQULuYfZL4QwpOgN3y6tFvnKI93boOxFeVzAMlJwwAg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:26f2:b0:58d:e099:8cb1 with SMTP id p50-20020a056a0026f200b0058de0998cb1mr35216600pfw.33.1674845722012; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.50.174] (rrcs-173-197-98-118.west.biz.rr.com. [173.197.98.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a23-20020aa79717000000b005898fcb7c1bsm3048246pfg.177.2023.01.27.10.55.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:55:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:55:18 -1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/36] tcg/tci: Add TCG_TARGET_CALL_{RET,ARG}_I128 Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20230126043824.54819-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <20230126043824.54819-12-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <87ilgsnkey.fsf@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson In-Reply-To: <87ilgsnkey.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a; envelope-from=richard.henderson@linaro.org; helo=mail-pf1-x42a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.148, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On 1/27/23 04:00, Alex Bennée wrote: >> + for (i = s = 0; i < n; ++i) { > > Why the pre-increment for ++i here? It doesn't make a difference surely? Why not? It doesn't make a difference. (Semi-reflexive preference driven by c++, where post-inc operator might (or might not) be less efficient, needing to return a copy of the class with the "old" value. But if you don't know, or don't care about the old value, use the pre-inc form.) r~