From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024AC4338F for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58A760F11 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:53:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org C58A760F11 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:42068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDMZc-00042i-KX for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:53:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDMYk-0003FE-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:52:29 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:50445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDMYh-0002fx-2b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:52:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1628581941; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wPRoVfml7cSDAY7lNHhfzlrHQESElDDst9p5BT53RX0=; b=HtkC/eKBA3Tkz7PuDc2F/P5Oj/DcurxYkjlQpK+8yUvtqMGKIMibKEMsURcgcz0BB/Hrsk H9sD7VMktZyjjh7guo1/WgsY7rgETyClLye3wsl151DgK/wxqUUHVuNbceUbaTP2NS42bC WThxujy4zn82T0QMsQ62guY+UcBTd6g= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-340-ZbDVVWOmNgKeCnLcd-3g3Q-1; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 03:52:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZbDVVWOmNgKeCnLcd-3g3Q-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id z10-20020a5d440a0000b0290154e0f00348so2656344wrq.4 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:52:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=wPRoVfml7cSDAY7lNHhfzlrHQESElDDst9p5BT53RX0=; b=rO47wNbUA8x6ncRZKVUgbcE6osO2gOHjNhpVRzTHR6WYNyWniARgejhVdUEdJ7hnYu AdmXbkeC/7dxgD/RvwtmkkJydIwaswrV8ZcmyaPx3/L0xXtd9SYsjbhtA/93XMRbCExr 1tsNCV62fFDVWIyfX23qDjngYaS27w2ZDEv5Jtizy/ASfZpUwxr7Fn62wgFRPZJmf/Za mFX0nfYmvQEpm5wGJYbNci7zaaJnpGE3lXp4UYidS7OSM7DrslBhQfZKOPrsgr7rQRt3 jVfNOPsz42UTgJO2VBiX9Blhs1H7D2NyA4bnFkpIRIZALKFHVcqW7/sHZog50G/jgJ0C ELaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zDdmPeP7d7zyX07KRtE1PzX2QpZ1bECweiLgut9+MEwocxgWG L++5ps+De/9G/UQXd2HJaiaXcYBvQ2SUbrtr9zsoXF19Oth/bftifhwGz1514MKlW4sx/xGZFXB fSLnA2WJR29YCV4w= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f8c8:: with SMTP id f8mr30033247wrq.204.1628581938911; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDM9Xi7Kw5wst4+3tIVtP/zAeRV1hCmkaqUJ062wz2XUOQ+cGHrMVlddNyRlMX3RTIMYNI3g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f8c8:: with SMTP id f8mr30033221wrq.204.1628581938623; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dresden.str.redhat.com ([2a02:908:1e46:160:b272:8083:d5:bc7d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm7761776wms.44.2021.08.10.00.52.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PULL 0/2] Block patches for 6.1-rc3 To: Peter Maydell References: <20210809170319.740284-1-hreitz@redhat.com> From: Hanna Reitz Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:52:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=hreitz@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=hreitz@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.702, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , QEMU Developers , Qemu-block Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 09.08.21 20:43, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 18:03, Hanna Reitz wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Let me prefix this by saying that it's me, Max. I've changed my name >> and email address. I understand freeze may not be the best of times for >> this, but it looks like I can no longer send mails from the mreitz@ >> address for now (only receive them). >> >> I've tried to create and sign the tag as Max, so I hope this pull >> request won't run into any issues from that perspective. >> >> (For the future, I'll create a new key and hope signing it with my old >> key will make it sufficiently trustworthy...) > Yep, that's fine. This pullreq is going through OK (will send the > usual applied/errors email once the builds have completed). I'm happy > to treat signed-by-old-key as trusted enough. (In fact we already > are working basically on trust-on-first-use for new keys, but if > you're OK with signing your new key with the old one that does > simplify things a bit.) Great! > Do you plan to send a patch to MAINTAINERS ? It has some > mreitz@redhat lines in it currently. Yes, I do. Hanna