qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm: Don't assume kernel can provide a GICv2
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:42:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0f6d435-050e-0e2f-6e81-15d50e72c19c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225182435.1131-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>

On 2/25/20 7:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In our KVM GICv2 realize function, we try to cope with old kernels
> that don't provide the device control API (KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL): we
> try to use the device control, and if that fails we fall back to
> assuming that the kernel has the old style KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP and
> that it will provide a GICv2.
> 
> This doesn't cater for the possibility of a kernel and hardware which
> only provide a GICv3, which is very common now.  On that setup we
> will abort() later on in kvm_arm_pmu_set_irq() when we try to wire up
> an interrupt to the GIC we failed to create:
> 
> qemu-system-aarch64: PMU: KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR: Invalid argument
> qemu-system-aarch64: failed to set irq for PMU
> Aborted
> 
> If the kernel advertises KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL we should trust it if it
> says it can't create a GICv2, rather than assuming it has one.  We
> can then produce a more helpful error message including a hint about
> the most probable reason for the failure.
> 
> If the kernel doesn't advertise KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL then it is truly
> ancient by this point but we might as well still fall back to a
> KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP GICv2.
> 
> With this patch then the user misconfiguration which previously
> caused an abort now prints:
> qemu-system-aarch64: Initialization of device kvm-arm-gic failed: error creating in-kernel VGIC: No such device
> Perhaps the host CPU does not support GICv2?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> I spent a while wondering if the PMU code was broken before Marc
> put me on the right track about what was going wrong (ie that
> I hadn't put "-machine gic-version=host" on the commandline).
> 
>   hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> index 9deb15e7e69..d7df423a7a3 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm.c
> @@ -551,7 +551,16 @@ static void kvm_arm_gic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>                                 KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT, NULL, true,
>                                 &error_abort);
>           }
> +    } else if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL)) {
> +        error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "error creating in-kernel VGIC");
> +        error_append_hint(errp,
> +                          "Perhaps the host CPU does not support GICv2?\n");
>       } else if (ret != -ENODEV && ret != -ENOTSUP) {
> +        /*
> +         * Very ancient kernel without KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: assume that
> +         * ENODEV or ENOTSUP mean "can't create GICv2 with KVM_CREATE_DEVICE",
> +         * and that we will get a GICv2 via KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP.
> +         */
>           error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "error creating in-kernel VGIC");
>           return;
>       }
> 

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-25 18:24 [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gic_kvm: Don't assume kernel can provide a GICv2 Peter Maydell
2020-02-25 18:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-02-26  8:52 ` Andrew Jones
2020-02-26  8:56   ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-26  9:17     ` Andrew Jones
2020-02-26 11:58       ` Auger Eric
2020-02-26 17:09         ` Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0f6d435-050e-0e2f-6e81-15d50e72c19c@redhat.com \
    --to=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).