qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] meson: ensure we enable CMPXCHG128 on x86_64
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:44:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c106f7a4-7f73-49c8-8b31-3f468004ed2c@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bbbeebd4-2769-41f3-8cd0-1c0121ed4f06@linaro.org>

On 10/5/24 10:34, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> On 10/5/24 09:16, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> 05.10.2024 01:01, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>>> Alex discovered that CMPXCHG128 was not enabled when building for
>>> x86_64, resulting in slow execution for wide atomic instructions,
>>> creating a huge contention when combined with a high number of cpus
>>> (found while booting android aarch64 guest on x86_64 host).
>>>
>>> The problem is that even though we enable -mcx16 option for x86_64, this
>>> is not used when testing for CMPXCHG128. Thus, we silently turn it off.
>>>
>>> x86_64 is the only architecture adding machine flags for now, so the
>>> problem is limited to this host architecture.
>>>
>>> Meson compiler tests are supposed to be independent of environment flags
>>> (https://mesonbuild.com/Reference-manual_returned_compiler.html#returned-by).
>>> However, CFLAGS are used anyway, thus masking the problem when using
>>> something like CFLAGS='-march=native'. This is a meson bug and was reported:
>>> https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/13757
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>     meson.build | 10 +++++++++-
>>>     1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
>>> index b18c2a54ab5..af2ce595dcc 100644
>>> --- a/meson.build
>>> +++ b/meson.build
>>> @@ -2867,6 +2867,13 @@ if has_int128_type
>>>         config_host_data.set('CONFIG_ATOMIC128_OPT', has_atomic128_opt)
>>>     
>>>         if not has_atomic128_opt
>>> +
>>> +      host_flags = []
>>> +      if host_arch == 'x86_64'
>>> +        # for x86_64, x86_version must be >= 1, and we always enable cmpxchg16
>>> +        # in this case.
>>> +        host_flags += ['-mcx16']
>>> +      endif
>>>           config_host_data.set('CONFIG_CMPXCHG128', cc.links('''
>>>             int main(void)
>>>             {
>>> @@ -2874,7 +2881,8 @@ if has_int128_type
>>>               __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16(&x, y, x);
>>>               return 0;
>>>             }
>>> -      '''))
>>> +      ''',
>>> +      args: host_flags))
>>>         endif
>>>       endif
>>>     endif
>>
>>
>> This does not look right.  We test with an extra compiler flag, we should
>> ensure it is actually enabled for the actual build.  Here, we only test
>> if cmpxchg128 works with this flag appended, but do not enable if for
>> the build.  It just happens we have it enabled elsewhere..
>>
>> Maybe we should add this flags somewhere to $qemu_cflags in this place
>> if the test were successful.  With the proposed variant it is confusing
>> and works just because it happens to match in a few places, not because
>> it is supposed to work :)
> 
> If you look upper in meson.build (x86_version), you'll see this flag
> (-mcx16) is *always* enabled for x86_64, which is what the comment
> states in this patch.
> So it's already added to qemu_common_flags anyway. The problem is just
> that when we call cc.links, environment we defined is not reused.
> After discussing on IRC, we identified it was a really special case only
> for x64 and this instruction, so I didn't find useful to make a more
> complex solution than just using the same flag.
> 
> Maybe it would be more clear to define a qemu_machine_flags, and reuse
> it here (or in other places where it might be needed), but I feel like
> it's too complicated, and we can always add this later.
> 
> I'm open to implement something different for flags management, but I
> feel like we are thinking too much ahead.
> 
>>
>> Besides, in the current situation where CONFIG_CMPXCHG128 is not defined
>> due to this bug, the final link fails due to generated calls to -latomic, -
>> which might mean we have something else wrong.
>>
> 
> By default, __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16 is not available, except if
> we use explicitely -mcx16, or if we use an -march that implies this.
> 
> Our default level for x86_version does not enable it.
> 
> $ cat ./build/meson-logs/meson-log.txt
> 
> Code:
> 
>   
>   
> 
>           int main(void)
>   
> 
>           {
> 
>             __uint128_t x = 0, y = 0;
> 
>             __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16(&x, y, x);
>   
> 
>             return 0;
>   
> 
>           }
>   
> 
>   
> 
> -----------
>   
> 
> Command line: `cc -m64
> /home/user/.work/qemu/build/meson-private/tmpkoy6pfnd/testfile.c -o
> /home/user/.work/qemu/build/meson-private/tmpkoy6pfnd/output.exe -O2 -g
> -fno-omit-f
> rame-pointer -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O0 -std=gnu11` -> 1
>   
> 
> stderr:
>   
> 
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cccPzS5X.o: in function `main':
> 
> /home/user/.work/qemu/build/meson-private/tmpkoy6pfnd/testfile.c:5:
> undefined reference to `__sync_val_compare_and_swap_16'
> 
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> -----------
> 
>> FWIW.
>>
>> /mjt

Initially, the flag -mcx16 was forced in definition of CC in meson cross 
file (see c2bf2ccb266dc9ae4a6da75b845f54535417e109).
When it was removed and added in meson.build instead, it silently 
deactivated cmpxchg128 feature detection, and since everything still 
compiles/links correctly, we didn't notice until a recent investigation 
on a performance issue.

Root cause if that we try to identify a feature that depends on a 
specific compilation flag, and it's a scenario for which 
cc.compiles/cc.links is not designed out of the box. So it's normal that 
we have to add this flag manually somewhere.

I feel that having this explicitely in the meson.build is better than 
implicitly define it in value of CC.

I'm open to any idea you would like, we just need to have this flag 
somewhere, that's what fix the problem.

Regards,
Pierrick


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-05 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04 22:01 [PATCH] meson: ensure we enable CMPXCHG128 on x86_64 Pierrick Bouvier
2024-10-05 16:16 ` Michael Tokarev
2024-10-05 16:20   ` Richard Henderson
2024-10-05 16:22     ` Michael Tokarev
2024-10-05 16:30       ` Michael Tokarev
2024-10-05 17:34   ` Pierrick Bouvier
2024-10-05 17:44     ` Pierrick Bouvier [this message]
2024-10-07  8:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c106f7a4-7f73-49c8-8b31-3f468004ed2c@linaro.org \
    --to=pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).