From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0hKK-000723-21
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:35:52 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D0hKE-00070B-Pb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:35:48 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0hKC-0006xQ-OW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:35:44 -0500
Received: from [64.233.170.200] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0h3G-0007lm-O2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:18:14 -0500
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so956145rne
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c10dbf45050214061823422e24@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:18:12 +0300
From: Phil Krylov <phil.krylov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Plex86 and Qemu
In-Reply-To: <001c01c51203$24d2e510$254d21d1@computername>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <200502121018.09039.jm@poure.com>
	<20050213170136.GB28580@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<001e01c511f3$1aae1ab0$254d21d1@computername>
	<20050213182734.GA29432@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<001c01c51203$24d2e510$254d21d1@computername>
Reply-To: Phil Krylov <phil.krylov@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:35:10 -0600, jeebs@yango.us <jeebs@yango.us> wrote:
> Yeah... Some Linux mail readers do seem to have problems with line lengths.  You'd think they'd fix it and add reasonable line wrapping, but... Heck... even the old dial up BBS newsgroups (Fidonet etc.) in the 80's and 90's had mail readers that could handle long lines and do line wrapping...  [shrug]

As well as some Web mail readers and mailing list Web archives. 

-- Ph.