From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Oksana Vohchana <ovoshcha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
ehabkost@redhat.com, wainersm@redhat.com, crosa@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-5.0 v3] Acceptance test: Fix to EXEC migration
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:30:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2007a51-318a-c935-dd77-232e45587b08@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325113138.20337-1-ovoshcha@redhat.com>
Hi Oksana,
v2 was
https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg682899.html, so
this is v3. Please increment the version in the patch subject.
You could also send a simple "ping" to the specific patch, instead of
resending it.
On 3/25/20 12:31 PM, Oksana Vohchana wrote:
> The exec migration test isn't run a whole test scenario.
> This patch fixes it
>
> Signed-off-by: Oksana Vohchana <ovoshcha@redhat.com>
v1 of this patch has already received reviewers tags
(https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg679629.html),
please collect them and keep them when you resend the same patch:
Fixes: 2e768cb682bf
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/acceptance/migration.py | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/migration.py b/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> index a8367ca023..0365289cda 100644
> --- a/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> +++ b/tests/acceptance/migration.py
> @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ class Migration(Test):
>
> @skipUnless(find_command('nc', default=False), "'nc' command not found")
> def test_migration_with_exec(self):
> - """
> - The test works for both netcat-traditional and netcat-openbsd packages
> - """
> + """The test works for both netcat-traditional and netcat-openbsd packages."""
Btw why are you changing the comment style?
> free_port = self._get_free_port()
> dest_uri = 'exec:nc -l localhost %u' % free_port
> + src_uri = 'exec:nc localhost %u' % free_port
> + self.do_migrate(dest_uri, src_uri)
>
Alex, if there is no Python testing pullreq, can you take this patch via
your testing tree?
Thanks,
Phil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 11:31 [PATCH] Acceptance test: Fix to EXEC migration Oksana Vohchana
2020-03-25 12:30 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-03-25 14:10 ` [PATCH-for-5.0 v3] " Oksana Voshchana
2020-03-25 14:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-25 15:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-03-30 11:29 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-25 14:42 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c2007a51-318a-c935-dd77-232e45587b08@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=ovoshcha@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).