From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] qapi: use qemu_strtod() in string-input-visitor
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:54:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c25b8530-7451-7291-471c-1f30c2c35655@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d78da85-c758-a281-6a20-9f1335b50fe8@redhat.com>
On 15.11.18 14:17, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/15/18 5:09 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
>>> Three more: in qobject-input-visitor.c's
>>> qobject_input_type_number_keyval(),
>>
>> This one is interesting, as it properly bails out when parsing "inf"
>> (via isFinite()). - should we do the same for the string input visitor?
>>
>> Especially, should we forbid "inf" and "NaN" in both scenarios?
>
> JSON can't represent non-finite doubles. Internally, we might be able to
> use them, but you have a point that consistently rejecting non-finite in
> all of our QAPI parsers makes it easier to reason about the code base
> (the command line can't be used to inject a value not possible via QMP).
> So that makes sense to me. qemu_strtod() shouldn't reject non-finite
> numbers (because it is useful for more than just qapi), but we could add
> a new qemu_strtod_finite() if that would help avoid duplication.
>
Yes, I'll exactly add that! Thanks
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-15 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-09 11:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] qapi: rewrite string-input-visitor David Hildenbrand
2018-11-09 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] cutils: add qemu_strtod() David Hildenbrand
2018-11-09 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] qapi: use qemu_strtod() in string-input-visitor David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 16:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-15 11:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-15 13:17 ` Eric Blake
2018-11-15 13:54 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2018-11-15 14:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-09 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/6] qapi: rewrite string-input-visitor David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 17:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-14 19:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-15 9:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-15 10:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-15 14:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-09 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/6] test-string-input-visitor: use virtual walk David Hildenbrand
2018-11-09 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/6] test-string-input-visitor: split off uint64 list tests David Hildenbrand
2018-11-14 16:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-14 20:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-11-15 9:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2018-11-09 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/6] test-string-input-visitor: add range overflow tests David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c25b8530-7451-7291-471c-1f30c2c35655@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).